Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing · New Mexico

Celtech Corporation

Carlsbad, NM · ~48 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Celtech Corporation runs at 116% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Celtech Corporation: 3.8 TCR = 116% of Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Celtech Corporation safety composite

Celtech Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Celtech Corporation held a steady TCR band

Celtech Corporation's TCR held near 0.2 from 2.6 in 2017 to 2.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 14.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.6 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=2.0 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=14.1 · 2022=4.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Carlsbad, NM ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.8 · 116% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK P20
  • PHOTO 2967-CA160
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2967-CA160 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Mexico employers → · Look up another →

Celtech Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Celtech Corporation averages 3.8 TCR (116% of the Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Celtech Corporation TCR series: 2017=2.6 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=2 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=14.1 · 2022=4 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Celtech Corporation falls in its industry

650 Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g. establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Celtech Corporation (48 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Celtech Corporation
Celtech Corporation (48 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Celtech Corporation has fewer employees than the Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dus median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.0 4.0 0 2 0
2021 14.1 14.1 1 6 0
2020 3.2 2.3 4 3 0
2019 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2018 2.2 0.0 1 0 0
2017 2.6 2.6 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · NM · Carlsbad

650 Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,241 rated employers in New Mexico with headcount on file · 71 employers in Carlsbad, NM · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 2967-CA160 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ATK Space Systems, LLC - Magna 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cygnus, Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR LISI Aerospace 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Meter Reader Facility Building 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Las Cruces 1 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE CORBINS ELECTRIC - ALBUQUERQUE,NM 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5016_11543 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nuclear Waste Partnership 951 FTE
CITY-NEAR WIPP 906 FTE
CITY-NEAR MS - Carlsbad, NM - 1CANM 569 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Carlsbad 493 FTE
NAT-TCR ACLP CILA Office 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Shamrock Paving 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Signature Building Systems 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Terraces of Phoenix 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Spencer's Fresh Markets #2 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Copper Construction Co., Inc. 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hood Container Asheville 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE E B Airfoils, LLC 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.