Manufacturing building construction · Pennsylvania

Signature Building Systems

Moosic, PA · ~178 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Signature Building Systems runs at 132% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Manufacturing building construction workplace, earning a grade D.

Signature Building Systems: 3.8 TCR = 132% of Manufacturing building construction BLS 2.9 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Signature Building Systems safety composite

Signature Building Systems scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 32% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.6

2016→2024

Signature Building Systems injury rate improved

Signature Building Systems's TCR fell 8.6 from 9.7 in 2016 to 1.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.7 · 2017=3.0 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · Moosic, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 3.8 · 132% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #17/33
  • PHOTO Precision Industrial
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 66 inj
  • SIZE ~178 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Precision Industrial (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Signature Building Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Signature Building Systems averages 3.8 TCR (132% of the Manufacturing building construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Signature Building Systems TCR series: 2016=9.7 · 2017=3 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=1.2 · BLS 2.9

Where Signature Building Systems falls in its industry

924 Manufacturing building constru establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 33 Manufacturing building constru employers in Pennsylvania.

Signature Building Systems (178 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Signature Building Systems
Signature Building Systems (178 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Signature Building Systems has more employees than the Manufacturing building construction median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.2 1.2 2 0 0
2023 2.7 2.2 5 0 0
2022 2.7 2.1 5 0 0
2021 3.5 2.4 6 0 1
2020 3.7 3.1 6 0 0
2019 3.5 3.5 7 0 0
2018 4.5 4.5 8 0 0
2017 3.0 1.5 6 0 0
2016 9.7 9.7 21 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · PA · Moosic

924 Manufacturing building construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 25 employers in Moosic, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Precision Industrial 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mike Owen Fabrication Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alliance Mill Consulting Inc 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Transwall Office Systems 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE PurePenn d/b/a Trulieve 178 FTE
STATE-SIZE BrandSafway Industries LLC - Shell Maintenance - Monaca 178 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smithfield Foods 178 FTE
STATE-SIZE Versatex Building Products 178 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mia Products 218 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bracey's Supermarket Inc., Moosic 176 FTE
CITY-NEAR Moosic 119 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gerrity's Supermarkets, Moosic 105 FTE
NAT-TCR Terraces of Phoenix 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Hardaway Construction Corp 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Celtech Corporation 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Pratt Intermodal Chassis LLC 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Keystone RV Company - Plant 7 178 FTE
NAT-SIZE W.E. O'Neil Construction Co. of California 178 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ankeny Linde Gas & Equipment Inc. 178 FTE
NAT-SIZE King Kullen #102 178 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.