Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · New York

Center For Lifelong Learning

Penn Yan, NY · ~66 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Center For Lifelong Learning runs at 341% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Center For Lifelong Learning: 13.0 TCR = 341% of Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Center For Lifelong Learning safety composite

Center For Lifelong Learning scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−22.5

2016→2019

Center For Lifelong Learning injury rate improved

Center For Lifelong Learning's TCR fell 22.5 from 24.2 in 2016 to 1.7 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 24.2 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=24.2 · 2019=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Penn Yan, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.0 · 341% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #138/158
  • PHOTO Elba DH
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Elba DH (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Center For Lifelong Learning in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Center For Lifelong Learning averages 13.0 TCR (341% of the Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Center For Lifelong Learning TCR series: 2016=24.2 · 2019=1.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Center For Lifelong Learning falls in its industry

1,320 Activity centers for disabled establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #138 safest of 158 Activity centers for disabled employers in New York.

Center For Lifelong Learning (66 employees, TCR 13.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Center For Lifelong Learning
Center For Lifelong Learning (66 employees, TCR 13.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Center For Lifelong Learning has fewer employees than the Activity centers for disabled persons, t median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 1.7 0.0 1 0 0
2016 24.2 18.2 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · NY · Penn Yan

1,320 Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 23 employers in Penn Yan, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Elba DH 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mashpee CCI 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chrestomathy II 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chrestomathy of Dakota County 13.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Vireo Health of NY - Johnstown 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mammoser Farms 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE H.H. Dobbins Inc. 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Merrick District 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR Soldiers and Sailors Memorial Hospital 299 FTE
CITY-NEAR KANPAK Manufacturing Penn Yan 217 FTE
CITY-NEAR Silgan Plastics Penn Yan 169 FTE
CITY-NEAR KANPAKUS Manufacturing Penn Yan 169 FTE
NAT-TCR Campbell Lane 13.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Bemsalem Depot 13.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Uge Btv 13.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Embassy Suites Chicago Downtown 13.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pharmachem Laboratories 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Converse Electric 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Covanta Montgomery, Inc. 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Max & Erma's Cranberry 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.