Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · Minnesota

Chrestomathy II

Eden Prairie, MN · ~30 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chrestomathy II runs at 339% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Chrestomathy II: 12.9 TCR = 339% of Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chrestomathy II safety composite

Chrestomathy II scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2017→2024

Chrestomathy II injury rate improved

Chrestomathy II's TCR fell 0.5 from 9.1 in 2017 to 8.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 20.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.1 · 2018=14.4 · 2019=10.6 · 2020=5.1 · 2021=20.8 · 2022=18.3 · 2023=16.1 · 2024=8.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Eden Prairie, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.9 · 339% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK #34/44
  • PHOTO Elba DH
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Elba DH (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Chrestomathy II in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chrestomathy II averages 12.9 TCR (339% of the Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chrestomathy II TCR series: 2017=9.1 · 2018=14.4 · 2019=10.6 · 2020=5.1 · 2021=20.8 · 2022=18.3 · 2023=16.1 · 2024=8.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Chrestomathy II falls in its industry

1,320 Activity centers for disabled establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #34 safest of 44 Activity centers for disabled employers in Minnesota.

Chrestomathy II (30 employees, TCR 12.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Chrestomathy II
Chrestomathy II (30 employees, TCR 12.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Chrestomathy II has fewer employees than the Activity centers for disabled persons, t median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.6 4.3 2 0 0
2023 16.1 16.1 4 0 0
2022 18.3 13.8 4 0 0
2021 20.8 20.8 0 4 0
2020 5.1 5.1 0 1 0
2019 10.6 10.6 3 0 0
2018 14.4 10.8 4 0 0
2017 9.1 9.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · MN · Eden Prairie

1,320 Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 242 employers in Eden Prairie, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Elba DH 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6146-61463000-6003 12.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Center For Lifelong Learning 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR AWA-SB 12.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nelson Nursery 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northern Plains Dairy 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Dairy, Westland Dairy 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pipestone Grow Finish 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2573-MN101 1,940 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2573-MN051 1,643 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota 1,632 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fortra, LLC 1,367 FTE
NAT-TCR Everett 235 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Kansas City Assembly 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR New Cumberland Ambulance Service Inc. 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 1110 - NSM Hawthorne 12.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE EZ Mix Inc - Tuxford 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hays Hatchery 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fire Department 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spadra Feed Mill 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.