Water distribution (except irrigation) · Arizona

Central Arizona Water Conservation District

Phoenix, AZ · ~484 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Central Arizona Water Conservation District runs at 139% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Water distribution (except irrigation) workplace, earning a grade D.

Central Arizona Water Conservation District: 1.7 TCR = 139% of Water distribution (except irrigation) BLS 1.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Central Arizona Water Conservation District safety composite

Central Arizona Water Conservation District scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Central Arizona Water Conservation District held a steady TCR band

Central Arizona Water Conservation District's TCR held near 0.2 from 1.6 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.6 · 2023=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221310 · Phoenix, AZ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 1.7 · 139% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #10/30
  • PHOTO DWM-Plumbing Inspect…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~484 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DWM-Plumbing Inspectors | 445 N. Sacramento (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Central Arizona Water Conservation District in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Central Arizona Water Conservation District averages 1.7 TCR (139% of the Water distribution (except irrigation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Central Arizona Water Conservation District TCR series: 2016=1.6 · 2023=1.8 · BLS 1.2

Where Central Arizona Water Conservation District falls in its industry

727 Water distribution (except irr establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 30 Water distribution (except irr employers in Arizona.

Central Arizona Water Conservation District (484 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Central Arizona Water Conservation District
Central Arizona Water Conservation District (484 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Central Arizona Water Conservation District has more employees than the Water distribution (except irrigation) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.8 0.7 8 0 0
2016 1.6 0.7 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221310 · AZ · Phoenix

727 Water distribution (except irrigation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DWM-Plumbing Inspectors | 445 N. Sacramento 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Illinois American Water (Alton) 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quadvest LP 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR West Basin Municipal Water District 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sunland Asphalt 484 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4701-740 484 FTE
STATE-SIZE IES Communications, LLC - Tempe 483 FTE
STATE-SIZE Haskins Electric - AZ 483 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR Smith Security System, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Liberal Arts Campus and Pacific Coast Campus 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 104054 - Omaha Riverfront 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR International Dehydrated Foods, Inc. - Monett 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE BKI - Georgia Main Branch 484 FTE
NAT-SIZE Western Nevada College 484 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rosen USA 484 FTE
NAT-SIZE Velux Greenwood LLC 484 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.