Water Supply and Irrigation Systems · California

Central California Irrigation District

Los Banos, CA · ~73 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Central California Irrigation District runs at 381% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Water Supply and Irrigation Systems workplace, earning a grade F.

Central California Irrigation District: 4.6 TCR = 381% of Water Supply and Irrigation Systems BLS 1.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Central California Irrigation District safety composite

Central California Irrigation District scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Central California Irrigation District: 2.7 → 6.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 6.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.28× in 2024

Central California Irrigation District's TCR rose 3.7 from 2.7 in 2018 to 6.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221310 · Los Banos, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.6 · 381% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #83/176
  • PHOTO Santa Margarita Wate…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Santa Margarita Water District (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Central California Irrigation District in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Central California Irrigation District averages 4.6 TCR (381% of the Water Supply and Irrigation Systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Central California Irrigation District TCR series: 2018=2.7 · 2024=6.4 · BLS 1.2

Where Central California Irrigation District falls in its industry

727 Water Supply and Irrigation Sy establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #83 safest of 176 Water Supply and Irrigation Sy employers in California.

Central California Irrigation District (73 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Central California Irrigation District
Central California Irrigation District (73 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Central California Irrigation District has more employees than the Water Supply and Irrigation Systems median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.4 1.3 4 1 0
2018 2.7 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221310 · CA · Los Banos

727 Water Supply and Irrigation Systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 52 employers in Los Banos, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Santa Margarita Water District 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR The York Water Company 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Seattle Public Utilities 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6020 - Tampa 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Columbia 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main Location 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE P-R Farms Inc/Palomate Inc 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 316 779 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Liberty Packing Company 590 FTE
CITY-NEAR Liberty Packing Company 496 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Valley Hospitals (30738) 374 FTE
NAT-TCR 5955 - Huntsville 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant Food Stores 6072 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR OC Jewish Home Center LLC DBA Fall River Jewish Home 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Thompson Denver 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Urban Air Fairfield Township 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Colonial Manor of Amana 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fairmont Senior Living On Clayton 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Victory Electric Cooperative Assn., Inc. 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.