Grape farming without making wine · California

Central Coast Labor Management Inc

Paso Robles, CA · ~339 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Central Coast Labor Management Inc runs at 46% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Grape farming without making wine workplace, earning a grade A.

Central Coast Labor Management Inc: 2.1 TCR = 46% of Grape farming without making wine BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Central Coast Labor Management Inc safety composite

Central Coast Labor Management Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2017→2022

Central Coast Labor Management Inc injury rate improved

Central Coast Labor Management Inc's TCR fell 3.4 from 3.4 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.4 · 2018=2.1 · 2020=2.8 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111332 · Paso Robles, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.1 · 46% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #29/151
  • PHOTO Anthony F Cubre Jr
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~339 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Anthony F Cubre Jr (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Central Coast Labor Management Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Central Coast Labor Management Inc averages 2.1 TCR (46% of the Grape farming without making wine BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Central Coast Labor Management Inc TCR series: 2017=3.4 · 2018=2.1 · 2020=2.8 · 2022=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Central Coast Labor Management Inc falls in its industry

162 Grape farming without making w establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 151 Grape farming without making w employers in California.

Central Coast Labor Management Inc (339 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Central Coast Labor Management Inc
Central Coast Labor Management Inc (339 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Central Coast Labor Management Inc has more employees than the Grape farming without making wine median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.8 2.8 2 0 0
2018 2.1 0.7 2 1 0
2017 3.4 2.7 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111332 · CA · Paso Robles

162 Grape farming without making wine employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 89 employers in Paso Robles, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Anthony F Cubre Jr 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vineyard Management 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR J.R. AG SOLUTIONS, INC. 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Winemakers LLC Skyline Vineyard 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Foothill Fire Protection, Inc 339 FTE
STATE-SIZE ARDx San Diego Summers Ridge 339 FTE
STATE-SIZE MKS Santa Clara 339 FTE
STATE-SIZE PacBio Menlo Park 339 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 146 956 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 160 764 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pearce Services, LLC 677 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1660 Circle B Rd. Paso Robles, CA 93465 516 FTE
NAT-TCR Gdc 4 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Jupiter Medical Center-Food 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Hollywood35390 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 75 North Country Rd 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Adaptec Solutions 339 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plant 4 339 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tnebr - Memphis 339 FTE
NAT-SIZE SNF Flopam 339 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.