Food Service Contractors · Florida

Sodexo at Jupiter Medical Center-Food

Jupiter, FL · ~128 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Jupiter Medical Center-Food runs at 69% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Food Service Contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

Sodexo at Jupiter Medical Center-Food: 2.1 TCR = 69% of Food Service Contractors BLS 3.0 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Jupiter Medical Center-Food safety composite

Sodexo at Jupiter Medical Center-Food scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.5

2016→2022

Sodexo at Jupiter Medical Center-Food injury rate improved

Sodexo at Jupiter Medical Center-Food's TCR fell 4.5 from 4.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.5 · 2018=5.9 · 2019=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Jupiter, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 69% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #105/378
  • PHOTO EMU-EATERIES
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~128 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: EMU-EATERIES (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Jupiter Medical Center-Food in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Jupiter Medical Center-Food averages 2.1 TCR (69% of the Food Service Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Jupiter Medical Center-Food TCR series: 2016=4.5 · 2018=5.9 · 2019=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Sodexo at Jupiter Medical Center-Food falls in its industry

6,952 Food Service Contractors establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #105 safest of 378 Food Service Contractors employers in Florida.

Sodexo at Jupiter Medical Center-Food (128 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Jupiter Medical Center-Food
Sodexo at Jupiter Medical Center-Food (128 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Sodexo at Jupiter Medical Center-Food has more employees than the Food Service Contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 5.9 4.0 3 0 0
2016 4.5 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · FL · Jupiter

6,952 Food Service Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 95 employers in Jupiter, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR EMU-EATERIES 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR BHI-HOOSIER VILLAGE 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR GOOGLE SLU BLUEBILL 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 400475300 PENDER COUNTY SCH DIST 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE DCC Distribution Control Center 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dallas 1 Construction & Development 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tile It Indurstries Inc 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE Krebs Land Development 128 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pratt & Whitney - West Palm Beach 1,579 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US FL Jupiter 17900 Beeline Hw (5235) 1,170 FTE
CITY-NEAR Asplundh Tree Expert LLC-055 702 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US FL Jupiter Beeline Hwy DFC (5295) 691 FTE
NAT-TCR 75 North Country Rd 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Gdc 4 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Coast Labor Management Inc 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Salt Lake City 40050 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at National Zoological Park 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pass Christian PCM 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Fountains at Sea Bluffs 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mg Moh 128 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.