Commercial building construction general contractors · Nebraska

Central Confinement Service LLC

Columbus, NE · ~60 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Central Confinement Service LLC runs at 140% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Central Confinement Service LLC: 4.0 TCR = 140% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Central Confinement Service LLC safety composite

Central Confinement Service LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.6

2016→2021

Central Confinement Service LLC injury rate improved

Central Confinement Service LLC's TCR fell 5.6 from 9.0 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.0 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=4.7 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=4.0 · 2021=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Columbus, NE ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 140% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #36/52
  • PHOTO Campanelli
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Campanelli (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

Central Confinement Service LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Central Confinement Service LLC averages 4.0 TCR (140% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Central Confinement Service LLC TCR series: 2016=9 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=4.7 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=4 · 2021=3.5 · BLS 2.9

Where Central Confinement Service LLC falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 52 Commercial building constructi employers in Nebraska.

Central Confinement Service LLC (60 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Central Confinement Service LLC
Central Confinement Service LLC (60 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Central Confinement Service LLC has more employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.5 3.5 2 0 0
2020 4.0 2.0 2 0 0
2019 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2018 4.7 1.6 3 0 0
2017 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2016 9.0 0.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · NE · Columbus

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 91 employers in Columbus, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Campanelli 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Farmington 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Charles Hamptons A-1 Signs, Inc 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR S D Ellenbecker INC 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Google UNO1 Data Center 21120006 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Propak - Omaha, NE 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midwest Steel Works 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lincoln Tool and Design 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR BD Columbus West 1,148 FTE
CITY-NEAR BD Pharmaceutical Systems 971 FTE
CITY-NEAR Columbus Community Hospital 833 FTE
CITY-NEAR BD Columbus East 762 FTE
NAT-TCR 4818-SOCS 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 2077-Us Dd Nw Colton Branch 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR TWA 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 4769-6161-Pottery Barn 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kane Logistics, Inc.-Sam's 6596 MI 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE JEG & Sons, Inc. 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sonoma Retirement Community 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE 49 West Dudley Town Road 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.