Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) · Virginia

Central Fairfax Services

Springfield, VA · ~59 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Central Fairfax Services runs at 120% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) workplace, earning a grade D.

Central Fairfax Services: 4.6 TCR = 120% of Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Central Fairfax Services safety composite

Central Fairfax Services scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.1

2016→2020

Central Fairfax Services injury rate improved

Central Fairfax Services's TCR fell 4.1 from 8.3 in 2016 to 4.2 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.3 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.3 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=4.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624310 · Springfield, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 120% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #33/59
  • PHOTO Hope Network Behavio…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hope Network Behavioral Health (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Central Fairfax Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Central Fairfax Services averages 4.6 TCR (120% of the Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Central Fairfax Services TCR series: 2016=8.3 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=4.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Central Fairfax Services falls in its industry

1,455 Vocational rehabilitation or h establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 59 Vocational rehabilitation or h employers in Virginia.

Central Fairfax Services (59 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Central Fairfax Services
Central Fairfax Services (59 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Central Fairfax Services has more employees than the Vocational rehabilitation or habilitatio median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 4.2 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 5.8 3.5 5 0 0
2016 8.3 5.5 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624310 · VA · Springfield

1,455 Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 117 employers in Springfield, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hope Network Behavioral Health 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR College Hills 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Five Star Industries, Inc. 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MIDDLETOWN DC 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bluefield VA Trs Svc Bldg 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE AUGUSTA FACILTY 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pulte Homes 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE K. Hovnanian Mid-Atlantic Division, LLC 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR Global Specialty Fulfillment : UVA1 1,567 FTE
CITY-NEAR Energy Zone Center 1,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR FCPS - Food and Nutrition Services 1,445 FTE
CITY-NEAR Greenspring Village 957 FTE
NAT-TCR Holiday Inn Charlotte Center City 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Phoenix 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Store #107 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Resource Arizona, LLC 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE WMS Scottsville 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Audrey Sanders 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beatrice Grain 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE 006 Corte Madera Gallery 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.