Started pullet production · Arkansas

Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.

Green Forest, AR · ~93 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. runs at 55% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Started pullet production workplace, earning a grade B.

Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.: 2.5 TCR = 55% of Started pullet production BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. safety composite

Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2024

Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. injury rate improved

Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.2 from 3.5 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.95× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.5 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=2.0 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 112310 · Green Forest, AR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 55% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #4/8
  • PHOTO Pittsburg Complex 1 …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~93 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pittsburg Complex 1 and 2 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. averages 2.5 TCR (55% of the Started pullet production BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. TCR series: 2016=3.5 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=2 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 4.5

Where Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. falls in its industry

351 Started pullet production establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 8 Started pullet production employers in Arkansas.

Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. (93 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.
Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. (93 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. has more employees than the Started pullet production median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 2.3 2 0 0
2023 4.2 2.1 4 0 0
2022 2.0 2.0 2 0 0
2021 1.2 0.0 1 0 0
2020 3.5 1.8 4 0 0
2019 4.4 3.3 4 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2016 3.5 1.2 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

112310 · AR · Green Forest

351 Started pullet production employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 10 employers in Green Forest, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pittsburg Complex 1 and 2 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Canon Egg Farm 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Guthrie 21 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jenacre Egg Farm 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Blackstone Construction LLC 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flowers Bakery of Texarkana, LLC. 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rusken Packaging Harrisburg 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Delta Plastics Stuttgart 93 FTE
CITY-NEAR Green Forest Plant 1,289 FTE
CITY-NEAR Green Forest Par-Fry Plant 506 FTE
CITY-NEAR PSSI / TYSON FOODS INC. - GREEN FOREST 126 FTE
CITY-NEAR PSSI - 0527 Tyson Foods Inc. - Green Forest 94 FTE
NAT-TCR King Solutions,Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Florida Electric Cooperative, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Related Management Company LP Marshall Field Garden Apt 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Don Kennedy Roofing 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hendricks Power Cooperative 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Danzer Veneer Americas 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE 19-Usf-Olf Valley Mall 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tri Pointe Homes Charlotte 93 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.