Trucking, general freight, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) · South Carolina

Central Freight Lines - Greenville SC

Greenville, SC · ~34 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Central Freight Lines - Greenville SC runs at 86% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Trucking, general freight, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) workplace, earning a grade C.

Central Freight Lines - Greenville SC: 3.9 TCR = 86% of Trucking, general freight, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Central Freight Lines - Greenville SC safety composite

Central Freight Lines - Greenville SC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Central Freight Lines - Greenville SC: 3.4 → 4.4 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 4.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.15× in 2021

Central Freight Lines - Greenville SC's TCR rose 1.0 from 3.4 in 2018 to 4.4 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484122 · Greenville, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.9 · 86% of ind

  • DART 4.4 DART
  • RANK #10/46
  • PHOTO NAA-ESS
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NAA-ESS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Central Freight Lines - Greenville SC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Central Freight Lines - Greenville SC averages 3.9 TCR (86% of the Trucking, general freight, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Central Freight Lines - Greenville SC TCR series: 2018=3.4 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=4.4 · BLS 4.5

Where Central Freight Lines - Greenville SC falls in its industry

3,020 Trucking, general freight, lon establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 46 Trucking, general freight, lon employers in South Carolina.

Central Freight Lines - Greenville SC (34 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Central Freight Lines - Greenville SC
Central Freight Lines - Greenville SC (34 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Central Freight Lines - Greenville SC has fewer employees than the Trucking, general freight, long-distance median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.4 4.4 1 0 0
2020 3.7 3.7 1 0 0
2019 3.9 0.0 1 0 0
2018 3.4 3.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484122 · SC · Greenville

3,020 Trucking, general freight, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 573 employers in Greenville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NAA-ESS 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bolingbrook IL FXFE-BOL 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR GBO-ODFL 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR PKW-ODFL 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE TLG TURF 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE ArborGen Inc. Headquarters 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lancaster Operations Center 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marlboro Electric Cooperative Headquarters Office 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR GREENVILLE MEMORIAL MED CAMPUS 6,132 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Francis Health System 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gas Power Systems : Greenville, SC, USA 2,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSC : Greenville, SC, USA 2,673 FTE
NAT-TCR Hurricane Fence Co Richmond 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Indiana (CIN) 2401 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR CyRide 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Lakeside Foods, Inc. 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Home City Ice Company - Chicago - 170 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peak Staffing Inc 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heritage of Brookstone 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE CM Ams 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.