Ice, dry, manufacturing · Illinois

The Home City Ice Company - Chicago - 170

Chicago, IL · ~34 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Home City Ice Company - Chicago - 170 runs at 483% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Ice, dry, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

The Home City Ice Company - Chicago - 170: 15.9 TCR = 483% of Ice, dry, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Home City Ice Company - Chicago - 170 safety composite

The Home City Ice Company - Chicago - 170 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−17.3

2017→2021

The Home City Ice Company - Chicago - 170 injury rate improved

The Home City Ice Company - Chicago - 170's TCR fell 17.3 from 23.7 in 2017 to 6.5 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 23.7 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=23.7 · 2018=9.9 · 2019=18.7 · 2020=20.8 · 2021=6.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325120 · Chicago, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.9 · 483% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #18/18
  • PHOTO The Home City Ice Co…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Home City Ice Company - Bethel Park - 410 (0.4 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

The Home City Ice Company - Chicago - 170 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Home City Ice Company - Chicago - 170 averages 15.9 TCR (483% of the Ice, dry, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Home City Ice Company - Chicago - 170 TCR series: 2017=23.7 · 2018=9.9 · 2019=18.7 · 2020=20.8 · 2021=6.5 · BLS 3.3

Where The Home City Ice Company - Chicago - 170 falls in its industry

295 Ice, dry, manufacturing establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 18 Ice, dry, manufacturing employers in Illinois.

The Home City Ice Company - Chicago - 170 (34 employees, TCR 15.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100120 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Home City Ice Company - Chicago - 170
The Home City Ice Company - Chicago - 170 (34 employees, TCR 15.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 1.9

The Home City Ice Company - Chicago - 170 has fewer employees than the Ice, dry, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 6.5 3.2 2 0 0
2020 20.8 5.2 4 0 0
2019 18.7 0.0 5 0 0
2018 9.9 3.3 3 0 0
2017 23.7 5.9 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325120 · IL · Chicago

295 Ice, dry, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Home City Ice Company - Bethel Park - 410 15.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Home City Ice Company - East Greenville - 420 14.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Home City Ice Company - MLK - 210 14.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Office 13.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cresco Labs - Kankakee 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kendall Energy Facility 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Adams Electric 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Town of Normal - Water 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR Always There Staffing Grand Rapids MN 15.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 252790-Eaton Rapids Po 15.9 TCR
NAT-TCR On Top of the World Communities Clearwater Campus 15.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 639 Swn62 15.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Central Freight Lines - Greenville SC 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peak Staffing Inc 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heritage of Brookstone 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE CM Ams 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.