LTL (less-than-truckload) long-distance freight trucking · Texas

Central Freight Lines Inc - Line Haul

Ft Worth, TX · ~198 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Central Freight Lines Inc - Line Haul runs at 135% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical LTL (less-than-truckload) long-distance freight trucking workplace, earning a grade D.

Central Freight Lines Inc - Line Haul: 6.1 TCR = 135% of LTL (less-than-truckload) long-distance freight trucking BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Central Freight Lines Inc - Line Haul safety composite

Central Freight Lines Inc - Line Haul scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Central Freight Lines Inc - Line Haul: 3.2 → 8.9 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 8.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.12× in 2018

Central Freight Lines Inc - Line Haul's TCR rose 5.7 from 3.2 in 2017 to 8.9 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 1.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484122 · Ft Worth, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.1 · 135% of ind

  • DART 6.8 DART
  • RANK #165/237
  • PHOTO South Minneapolis MN…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~198 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: South Minneapolis MN FXFE-SMN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Central Freight Lines Inc - Line Haul in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Central Freight Lines Inc - Line Haul averages 6.1 TCR (135% of the LTL (less-than-truckload) long-distance freight trucking BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Central Freight Lines Inc - Line Haul TCR series: 2017=3.2 · 2018=8.9 · BLS 4.5

Where Central Freight Lines Inc - Line Haul falls in its industry

3,020 LTL (less-than-truckload) long establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #165 safest of 237 LTL (less-than-truckload) long employers in Texas.

Central Freight Lines Inc - Line Haul (198 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Central Freight Lines Inc - Line Haul
Central Freight Lines Inc - Line Haul (198 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Central Freight Lines Inc - Line Haul has more employees than the LTL (less-than-truckload) long-distance median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 8.9 6.8 17 0 0
2017 3.2 2.6 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484122 · TX · Ft Worth

3,020 LTL (less-than-truckload) long-distance freight trucking employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 63 employers in Ft Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR South Minneapolis MN FXFE-SMN 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR R+L Carriers - IRW 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR FL-Jacksonville-730-YRC Freight 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR GSP 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pleasanton 198 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Houston 198 FTE
STATE-SIZE WINCO MASONRY LP 198 FTE
STATE-SIZE Culberson Construction LLC 198 FTE
CITY-NEAR INDEPENDENCE HUB (TXFOR) 1,655 FTE
CITY-NEAR TXFOR - INDEPENDENCE HUB 1,540 FTE
CITY-NEAR Central Office 925 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-ZNFW 665 FTE
NAT-TCR Core-Mark - Los Angeles 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Peter's Nursing and Rehab Center 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Avon Hi-Life, Inc. 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR ISLF - Regents Park-Jacksonville, LLC 6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Schiller Grounds Care-JC Facility 198 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Line Affiliates 198 FTE
NAT-SIZE East Bay District Office (Caokn) 198 FTE
NAT-SIZE Facility Logistics Services Lexington 198 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.