Grass mowing equipment, powered lawn and garden, manufacturing · Wisconsin

Schiller Grounds Care-JC Facility

Johnson Creek, WI · ~198 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Schiller Grounds Care-JC Facility runs at 139% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Grass mowing equipment, powered lawn and garden, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Schiller Grounds Care-JC Facility: 4.6 TCR = 139% of Grass mowing equipment, powered lawn and garden, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Schiller Grounds Care-JC Facility safety composite

Schiller Grounds Care-JC Facility scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2016→2018

Schiller Grounds Care-JC Facility injury rate improved

Schiller Grounds Care-JC Facility's TCR fell 2.1 from 7.1 in 2016 to 5.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.1 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.98× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.1 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=5.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333112 · Johnson Creek, WI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 139% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #14/21
  • PHOTO Performance Welding,…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~198 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Performance Welding, LLC. (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Schiller Grounds Care-JC Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Schiller Grounds Care-JC Facility averages 4.6 TCR (139% of the Grass mowing equipment, powered lawn and garden, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Schiller Grounds Care-JC Facility TCR series: 2016=7.1 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=5 · BLS 3.3

Where Schiller Grounds Care-JC Facility falls in its industry

91 Grass mowing equipment, powere establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 21 Grass mowing equipment, powere employers in Wisconsin.

Schiller Grounds Care-JC Facility (198 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Schiller Grounds Care-JC Facility
Schiller Grounds Care-JC Facility (198 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Schiller Grounds Care-JC Facility has fewer employees than the Grass mowing equipment, powered lawn and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 5.0 4.5 9 1 0
2017 1.6 1.6 3 0 0
2016 7.1 6.6 12 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333112 · WI · Johnson Creek

91 Grass mowing equipment, powered lawn and garden, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 14 employers in Johnson Creek, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Performance Welding, LLC. 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amerequip New Holstein 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oregon Tool - KC Blades 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR ECHO Incorporated 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Global Headquarters 198 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fair Oaks Farms - West 198 FTE
STATE-SIZE SACO AEI Polymers 198 FTE
STATE-SIZE MPC 198 FTE
CITY-NEAR Doosan Bobcat Johnson Creek 344 FTE
CITY-NEAR MasterMold LLC Johnson Creek 280 FTE
CITY-NEAR JOHNSON CREEK WI - 3159 183 FTE
CITY-NEAR Avon Hi-Life, Inc. 133 FTE
NAT-TCR AmerisourceBergen-055 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Randall Tilt Structures 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Syracuse - North Plant 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Heritage Square Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, Inc. 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Main Line Affiliates 198 FTE
NAT-SIZE East Bay District Office (Caokn) 198 FTE
NAT-SIZE Facility Logistics Services Lexington 198 FTE
NAT-SIZE Providence Care Center 198 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.