Air system balancing and testing · Wisconsin

Central Mechanical Systems

Marshfield, WI · ~35 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Central Mechanical Systems runs at 262% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Air system balancing and testing workplace, earning a grade F.

Central Mechanical Systems: 7.3 TCR = 262% of Air system balancing and testing BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Central Mechanical Systems safety composite

Central Mechanical Systems scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2016→2024

Central Mechanical Systems injury rate improved

Central Mechanical Systems's TCR fell 2.8 from 10.8 in 2016 to 8.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 10.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.8 · 2017=3.3 · 2018=9.2 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=7.3 · 2021=10.0 · 2022=5.1 · 2023=7.1 · 2024=8.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Marshfield, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.3 · 262% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #123/154
  • PHOTO Climate Pros Atlanta
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Climate Pros Atlanta (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Central Mechanical Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Central Mechanical Systems averages 7.3 TCR (262% of the Air system balancing and testing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Central Mechanical Systems TCR series: 2016=10.8 · 2017=3.3 · 2018=9.2 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=7.3 · 2021=10 · 2022=5.1 · 2023=7.1 · 2024=8 · BLS 2.8

Where Central Mechanical Systems falls in its industry

5,793 Air system balancing and testi establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #123 safest of 154 Air system balancing and testi employers in Wisconsin.

Central Mechanical Systems (35 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Central Mechanical Systems
Central Mechanical Systems (35 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Central Mechanical Systems has fewer employees than the Air system balancing and testing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.0 0.0 3 0 0
2023 7.1 2.4 3 0 0
2022 5.1 0.0 2 0 0
2021 10.0 0.0 4 0 0
2020 7.3 2.4 2 1 0
2019 5.2 0.0 2 0 0
2018 9.2 0.0 3 0 0
2017 3.3 0.0 1 0 0
2016 10.8 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · WI · Marshfield

5,793 Air system balancing and testing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 94 employers in Marshfield, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Climate Pros Atlanta 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coolsys SLC 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bayside Comfort Inc 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR WF Hann and Sons 7.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corteva Agriscience JVL1-JanesvilleWI 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eau Claire Energy Cooperative 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE C00280-Josheph Campbell CO Milwaukee WI 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rite Hite 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Roehl Transport Inc 2,465 FTE
CITY-NEAR MMC- Marshfield 1,604 FTE
CITY-NEAR Roehl Refrigerated Transport 1,085 FTE
CITY-NEAR Masonite-Marshfield 436 FTE
NAT-TCR 3051 Keystone 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ishpeming Plant 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Joseph's Hospital 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR At Home Stores #114 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mercury Displacement Industries, Inc. 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Liberty Village of Geneseo 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE CMC Recycling Austin 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arboris LLC Newark 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.