Electric power distribution systems · Missouri

Central Mo Electric Cooperative, Inc

Sedalia, MO · ~33 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.2
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Central Mo Electric Cooperative, Inc runs at 853% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power distribution systems workplace, earning a grade F.

Central Mo Electric Cooperative, Inc: 10.2 TCR = 853% of Electric power distribution systems BLS 1.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Central Mo Electric Cooperative, Inc safety composite

Central Mo Electric Cooperative, Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2016→2021

Central Mo Electric Cooperative, Inc injury rate improved

Central Mo Electric Cooperative, Inc's TCR fell 4.0 from 10.4 in 2016 to 6.3 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 13.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.4 · 2017=13.6 · 2019=10.6 · 2021=6.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Sedalia, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.2 · 853% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #125/127
  • PHOTO LADWP 950 FIRST
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LADWP 950 FIRST (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Central Mo Electric Cooperative, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Central Mo Electric Cooperative, Inc averages 10.2 TCR (853% of the Electric power distribution systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Central Mo Electric Cooperative, Inc TCR series: 2016=10.4 · 2017=13.6 · 2019=10.6 · 2021=6.3 · BLS 1.2

Where Central Mo Electric Cooperative, Inc falls in its industry

2,958 Electric power distribution sy establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #125 safest of 127 Electric power distribution sy employers in Missouri.

Central Mo Electric Cooperative, Inc (33 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Central Mo Electric Cooperative, Inc
Central Mo Electric Cooperative, Inc (33 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Central Mo Electric Cooperative, Inc has fewer employees than the Electric power distribution systems median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 6.3 0.0 2 0 0
2019 10.6 10.6 3 0 0
2017 13.6 10.2 4 0 0
2016 10.4 6.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · MO · Sedalia

2,958 Electric power distribution systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 92 employers in Sedalia, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LADWP 950 FIRST 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR PA Warehouse 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pickwick Electric Cooperative 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hinesville Operating - 923W Oglethorpe Hwy. 10.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Black Gold Farms - MOA 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sharpe Land and Cattle Crop 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE LOCUST RIDGE #1-3, 5-9 -EST 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE SOMERSET #F, I, J, N, O, Q, W -EST 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sedalia Plant 1,556 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stanley Black & Decker - Sedalia Operations 714 FTE
CITY-NEAR THE CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES 646 FTE
CITY-NEAR ProEnergy Services, LLC 577 FTE
NAT-TCR The J. Horst Manufacturing Company 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 01 WA- Preston 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Blue Bucket Trucking LLC-Nj Drivers 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 2039-GWINNETT 10.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE CHK Manufacturing, Inc. 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE S & N Office 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Russ Darrow Direct 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ursa 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.