Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction · Florida

Central Service Area

Tampa, FL · ~353 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Central Service Area runs at 108% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction workplace, earning a grade C.

Central Service Area: 3.0 TCR = 108% of Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Central Service Area safety composite

Central Service Area scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Central Service Area held a steady TCR band

Central Service Area's TCR held near 0.0 from 1.9 in 2016 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 14.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.08× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.9 · 2017=14.8 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Tampa, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 108% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #69/98
  • PHOTO GLOBAL OPTICS SAN AN…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 47 inj
  • SIZE ~353 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GLOBAL OPTICS SAN ANTONIO, LP (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Central Service Area in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Central Service Area averages 3.0 TCR (108% of the Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Central Service Area TCR series: 2016=1.9 · 2017=14.8 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 2.8

Where Central Service Area falls in its industry

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communicat establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #69 safest of 98 Utility line (i.e., communicat employers in Florida.

Central Service Area (353 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Central Service Area
Central Service Area (353 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Central Service Area has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., communication, elect median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 0.2 8 0 0
2023 0.8 0.5 3 0 0
2022 1.5 1.3 6 0 0
2021 1.4 1.1 5 0 0
2020 0.6 0.6 2 0 0
2019 1.7 1.5 7 0 0
2018 2.6 1.8 9 0 0
2017 14.8 14.8 5 0 0
2016 1.9 1.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · FL · Tampa

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,659 employers in Tampa, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GLOBAL OPTICS SAN ANTONIO, LP 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cannon Construction 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR NA-US-NY-Amsterdam-Sam Stratton Road 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR NA-US-TX-Sugarland-S Sam Houston Parkway W 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Southern Development and Construction 353 FTE
STATE-SIZE Broward Mall 758 353 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1032 353 FTE
STATE-SIZE 331660000331660001331660002331660010 353 FTE
CITY-NEAR Diversified Maintenance Systems LLC 10,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tampa General Hospital 7,849 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valet Living, LLC 6,337 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST. Joseph's Hospital (5100) 5,540 FTE
NAT-TCR Mulvey Construction, Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR I.V. Mechanical, Inc. DBA: R & K Air 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 9200 Golden Valley, MN 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Delta Sky Club Atl A2 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Worthington Cylinders Westerville 353 FTE
NAT-SIZE Town of Smyrna 353 FTE
NAT-SIZE Warm Springs Rehabilitation Hospital of Westover Hills 353 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crenlo Engineered Cabs 353 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.