Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction · Texas

NA-US-TX-Sugarland-S Sam Houston Parkway W

Houston, TX · ~48 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NA-US-TX-Sugarland-S Sam Houston Parkway W runs at 108% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction workplace, earning a grade C.

NA-US-TX-Sugarland-S Sam Houston Parkway W: 3.0 TCR = 108% of Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NA-US-TX-Sugarland-S Sam Houston Parkway W safety composite

NA-US-TX-Sugarland-S Sam Houston Parkway W scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

NA-US-TX-Sugarland-S Sam Houston Parkway W: 0.0 → 6.0 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 6.0 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2017

NA-US-TX-Sugarland-S Sam Houston Parkway W's TCR rose 6.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 6.0 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Houston, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 108% of ind

  • DART 6.0 DART
  • RANK #110/161
  • PHOTO Cannon Construction
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cannon Construction (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

NA-US-TX-Sugarland-S Sam Houston Parkway W in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NA-US-TX-Sugarland-S Sam Houston Parkway W averages 3.0 TCR (108% of the Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NA-US-TX-Sugarland-S Sam Houston Parkway W TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=6 · BLS 2.8

Where NA-US-TX-Sugarland-S Sam Houston Parkway W falls in its industry

1,605 Alternative energy (e.g., geot establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #110 safest of 161 Alternative energy (e.g., geot employers in Texas.

NA-US-TX-Sugarland-S Sam Houston Parkway W (48 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate NA-US-TX-Sugarland-S Sam Houston Parkway W
NA-US-TX-Sugarland-S Sam Houston Parkway W (48 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

NA-US-TX-Sugarland-S Sam Houston Parkway W has fewer employees than the Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, oc median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 6.0 6.0 3 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · TX · Houston

1,605 Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cannon Construction 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR NA-US-NY-Amsterdam-Sam Stratton Road 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Central Service Area 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR GLOBAL OPTICS SAN ANTONIO, LP 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE SAN ANTONIO SOD FARM 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE SUPPORT SERVICES 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE WRANGLER FEED YARD 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kempenaar Dairy LLC 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR 06 Lakeville Warehouse 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 09 - Johnson City 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Joseph Center (Mijos) 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR QPSI Macungie 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Truman Valley Healthcare Inc 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of Malden LLC 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southeast Connections LLc ( Savannah, Georgia) 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Building 21/CP/Fleet /Maint 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.