Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) · Illinois

Central Stickney Fire Protection District

Chicago, IL · ~38 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Central Stickney Fire Protection District runs at 57% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) workplace, earning a grade B.

Central Stickney Fire Protection District: 1.8 TCR = 57% of Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) BLS 3.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Central Stickney Fire Protection District safety composite

Central Stickney Fire Protection District scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Central Stickney Fire Protection District: 0.0 → 275.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 275.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Central Stickney Fire Protection District's TCR rose 275.7 from 0.0 in 2017 to 275.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922160 · Chicago, IL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 57% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/262
  • PHOTO Washington Fire and …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Washington Fire and Rescue #2 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Central Stickney Fire Protection District in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Central Stickney Fire Protection District averages 1.8 TCR (57% of the Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Central Stickney Fire Protection District TCR series: 2017=0 · 2020=5.5 · 2022=0 · 2024=275.7 · BLS 3.2

Where Central Stickney Fire Protection District falls in its industry

793 Fire departments (e.g., govern establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 9.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 262 Fire departments (e.g., govern employers in Illinois.

Central Stickney Fire Protection District (38 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Central Stickney Fire Protection District
Central Stickney Fire Protection District (38 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8

Central Stickney Fire Protection District has fewer employees than the Fire departments (e.g., government, volu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 9.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 275.7 0.0 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 5.5 5.5 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922160 · IL · Chicago

793 Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Washington Fire and Rescue #2 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lanai Station 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Washington Fire/Rescue #1 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vadnais Heights South Fire Department 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE GDM Seeds, Inc - Gibson City, IL 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Distribution Operating - Peoria 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE 629 - Distribution Operating - Peoria 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Freeport 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR Sohacki Industries 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR MCR Oil Tools 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Atrium Medical Corporation 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Clearwater- #205 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Springfield Elementary 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cherry Hills Estates 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Toshiba Business Solutions - Eagan 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE S&G Excavating, Inc. 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.