Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Nebraska

Cherry Hills Estates

Valentine, NE · ~38 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cherry Hills Estates runs at 136% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Cherry Hills Estates: 5.2 TCR = 136% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cherry Hills Estates safety composite

Cherry Hills Estates scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cherry Hills Estates: 0.0 → 4.1 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 11.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.79× in 2024

Cherry Hills Estates's TCR rose 4.1 from 0.0 in 2017 to 4.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 11.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Valentine, NE ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.2 · 136% of ind

  • DART 4.1 DART
  • RANK #26/66
  • PHOTO Kingston Residence o…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kingston Residence of Santa Fe (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

Cherry Hills Estates in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cherry Hills Estates averages 5.2 TCR (136% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cherry Hills Estates TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=7.4 · 2022=11 · 2023=11.5 · 2024=4.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Cherry Hills Estates falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 66 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Nebraska.

Cherry Hills Estates (38 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Cherry Hills Estates
Cherry Hills Estates (38 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Cherry Hills Estates has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.1 4.1 1 0 0
2023 11.5 0.0 3 0 0
2022 11.0 3.7 3 0 0
2021 7.4 0.0 2 0 0
2020 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2019 3.6 3.6 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NE · Valentine

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 6 employers in Valentine, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kingston Residence of Santa Fe 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Women's Christian Association 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spring Ridge 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Azura Kenosha 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE R Lazy K Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE BHE - Papillion W 6th St (NE010) 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Energy Center Omaha 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Darland Construction 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henderson's IGA 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bomgaars Supply,Inc. - Valentine 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR 32730 STORE 32730 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shopko Hometown #523 (Valentine, NE) 22 FTE
NAT-TCR Brevard Robotics, Inc 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Arden Hills Lumber Yard 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Fourinox, Inc. 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Kenyon Plastering of Fresno, Inc. 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Toshiba Business Solutions - Eagan 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Stickney Fire Protection District 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Springfield Elementary 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Millwood Lumber Inc 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.