General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Less Than Truckload · Michigan

Central Transport - 505

Pontiac, MI · ~31 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Central Transport - 505 runs at 148% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Less Than Truckload workplace, earning a grade D.

Central Transport - 505: 6.7 TCR = 148% of General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Less Than Truckload BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Central Transport - 505 safety composite

Central Transport - 505 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Central Transport - 505: 0.0 → 2.8 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 18.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.43× in 2024

Central Transport - 505's TCR rose 2.8 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 18.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484122 · Pontiac, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.7 · 148% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #63/95
  • PHOTO NNF
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NNF (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Central Transport - 505 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Central Transport - 505 averages 6.7 TCR (148% of the General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Less Than Truckload BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Central Transport - 505 TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=9.5 · 2018=2.8 · 2020=18.2 · 2021=7.2 · 2022=6.6 · 2023=6.1 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 4.5

Where Central Transport - 505 falls in its industry

3,020 General Freight Trucking Long- establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #63 safest of 95 General Freight Trucking Long- employers in Michigan.

Central Transport - 505 (31 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Central Transport - 505
Central Transport - 505 (31 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Central Transport - 505 has fewer employees than the General Freight Trucking Long-Distance L median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2023 6.1 6.1 2 0 0
2022 6.6 6.6 2 0 0
2021 7.2 7.2 1 0 0
2020 18.2 18.2 5 0 0
2018 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2017 9.5 9.5 3 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484122 · MI · Pontiac

3,020 General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Less Than Truckload employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 95 employers in Pontiac, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NNF 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR XWB 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR SLV 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR R+L Carriers - MUS 6.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Schwartz Greenhouse, Inc. 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electric Production 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE R.B. Satkowiak's City Sewer Cleaners 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Melching Inc. 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DET3 2,861 FTE
CITY-NEAR Powertrain Headquaters 2,839 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Joseph Mercy Oakland Hospital SJMHS MI 2,521 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST JOSEPH MERCY OAKLAND 1,290 FTE
NAT-TCR Terre Haute South in - 3363 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR UWC Transportation LLC 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Terra Tech Services Midland 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Vacri Construction Corporation 6.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Central Transport - 402 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Transport - 274 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Transport - 782 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4018 - Eau Claire Concrete Plant 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.