Gambling device concession operators (i.e., supplying and servicing in others' facilities), coin-operated · Montana

Century Gaming Technologies - Billings

Billings, MT · ~89 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Century Gaming Technologies - Billings runs at 71% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Gambling device concession operators (i.e., supplying and servicing in others' facilities), coin-operated workplace, earning a grade B.

Century Gaming Technologies - Billings: 2.2 TCR = 71% of Gambling device concession operators (i.e., supplying and servicing in others' facilities), coin-operated BLS 3.1 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Century Gaming Technologies - Billings safety composite

Century Gaming Technologies - Billings scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Century Gaming Technologies - Billings held a steady TCR band

Century Gaming Technologies - Billings's TCR held near 0.2 from 2.7 in 2020 to 2.9 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=2.7 · 2021=1.0 · 2022=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 713290 · Billings, MT AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 71% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK P61
  • PHOTO South Philadelphia T…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~89 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: South Philadelphia Turf Club (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Montana employers → · Look up another →

Century Gaming Technologies - Billings in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Century Gaming Technologies - Billings averages 2.2 TCR (71% of the Gambling device concession operators (i.e., supplying and servicing in others' facilities), coin-operated BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Century Gaming Technologies - Billings TCR series: 2020=2.7 · 2021=1 · 2022=2.9 · BLS 3.1

Where Century Gaming Technologies - Billings falls in its industry

150 Gambling device concession ope establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Century Gaming Technologies - Billings (89 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 162 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Century Gaming Technologies - Billings
Century Gaming Technologies - Billings (89 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 162 employees and a TCR of 2.8

Century Gaming Technologies - Billings has fewer employees than the Gambling device concession operators (i. median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.9 1.0 3 0 0
2021 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2020 2.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

713290 · MT · Billings

150 Gambling device concession operators (i.e., supplying and servicing in others' facilities), coin-operated employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,536 rated employers in Montana with headcount on file · 327 employers in Billings, MT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR South Philadelphia Turf Club 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bradley 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR O-BRONX DEPOT US198 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northern Distribution Center 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE On Site Management, Inc. 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE H-E Parts International - MSUSA 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lucky's Market, Missoula 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6400-SWY 0031 2999 89 FTE
CITY-NEAR Billings Clinic Hospital 2,366 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Vincent Healthcare 1,860 FTE
CITY-NEAR Billings Clinic Downtown Campus 1,223 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. John's Lutheran Ministries 651 FTE
NAT-TCR 103914 - City of Largo WWRF Biological Treatment 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Charlestown 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Olmsted Medical Center NW Clinic 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 3793 Supermercado Nuestra Familia (Q St, Omaha, Ne) 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Richfield a Villa Center 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spring Meadows a Villa Center 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Chambrel Pinecastle 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE SHARP TRANSIT LLC Salisbury NC 89 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.