In-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing · Texas

Cerilliant Corporation

Round Rock, TX · ~94 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cerilliant Corporation runs at 11% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical In-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Cerilliant Corporation: 0.4 TCR = 11% of In-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cerilliant Corporation safety composite

Cerilliant Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Cerilliant Corporation held a steady TCR band

Cerilliant Corporation's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=1.0 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325413 · Round Rock, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 11% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/11
  • PHOTO Moravek Inc.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~94 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Moravek Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Cerilliant Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cerilliant Corporation averages 0.4 TCR (11% of the In-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cerilliant Corporation TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=1 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Cerilliant Corporation falls in its industry

201 In-vitro diagnostic substances establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 11 In-vitro diagnostic substances employers in Texas.

Cerilliant Corporation (94 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 1.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 01234 Average employees Total Case Rate Cerilliant Corporation
Cerilliant Corporation (94 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 1.4

Cerilliant Corporation has fewer employees than the In-vitro diagnostic substances manufactu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.2 0.0 1 0 0
2021 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2020 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325413 · TX · Round Rock

201 In-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 203 employers in Round Rock, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Moravek Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ortho Clinical Diagnostics CNP100 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR QuidelOrtho Raritan 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ortho Clinical Diagnostics - Rochester Canal Ponds 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE CSS Farms - Dalhart 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corpus Christi Electric System Ops 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE 31090 - NEUAG 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Christensen Building Group, LLC 94 FTE
CITY-NEAR US TX Round Rock Office 01 5,052 FTE
CITY-NEAR Round Rock 2 1,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR US TX Round Rock Office 07 1,735 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Round Rock 1,576 FTE
NAT-TCR Brenntag Great Lakes - St. Paul 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Centerline, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Harvey-Cleary Builders - Maryland 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR ZF Electronic Systems Pleasant Prairie, LLC 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Broomall Manor 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corfu Foods Transportation and Warehousing 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woodinville - BMD 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corbin Park 94 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.