Commercial building construction · Maryland

Harvey-Cleary Builders - Maryland

Bethesda, MD · ~89 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Harvey-Cleary Builders - Maryland runs at 12% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Commercial building construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Harvey-Cleary Builders - Maryland: 0.4 TCR = 12% of Commercial building construction BLS 2.9 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Harvey-Cleary Builders - Maryland safety composite

Harvey-Cleary Builders - Maryland scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Harvey-Cleary Builders - Maryland held a steady TCR band

Harvey-Cleary Builders - Maryland's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=1.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Bethesda, MD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 12% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/99
  • PHOTO Bear Construction Co…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~89 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bear Construction Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Harvey-Cleary Builders - Maryland in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Harvey-Cleary Builders - Maryland averages 0.4 TCR (12% of the Commercial building construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Harvey-Cleary Builders - Maryland TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=1 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Harvey-Cleary Builders - Maryland falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 99 Commercial building constructi employers in Maryland.

Harvey-Cleary Builders - Maryland (89 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Harvey-Cleary Builders - Maryland
Harvey-Cleary Builders - Maryland (89 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Harvey-Cleary Builders - Maryland has more employees than the Commercial building construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.2 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2019 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · MD · Bethesda

4,692 Commercial building construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 107 employers in Bethesda, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bear Construction Company 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Frank V. Radomski & Sons, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR BRCO Constructors, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Omega Construction, Inc. 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE PEPCO- Control Center 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri Pointe Homes DC Metro 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Comer Construction, Inc. 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chesapeake Systems, LLC 89 FTE
CITY-NEAR Red Coats, Inc. 6,040 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vador Ventures Inc 5,569 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clark (Clark Construction, Clark Concrete,Clark Civil, Clark Foundations) 2,961 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clark Construction Group LLC 2,313 FTE
NAT-TCR Westview Avenue 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Associated Insulation, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Afflink - 0605 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Cerilliant Corporation 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Atlanta GA Sales Admin 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Indiana Laborers 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Desertview 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Houston Factory 89 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.