Hall and banquet room, nonresidential, rental or leasing · Pennsylvania

Cescaphe Limited, L.L.C.

Philadelphia, PA · ~422 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.1
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cescaphe Limited, L.L.C. runs at 719% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Hall and banquet room, nonresidential, rental or leasing workplace, earning a grade F.

Cescaphe Limited, L.L.C.: 10.1 TCR = 719% of Hall and banquet room, nonresidential, rental or leasing BLS 1.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cescaphe Limited, L.L.C. safety composite

Cescaphe Limited, L.L.C. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.3

2022→2023

Cescaphe Limited, L.L.C. injury rate improved

Cescaphe Limited, L.L.C.'s TCR fell 15.3 from 17.7 in 2022 to 2.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 17.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=17.7 · 2023=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531120 · Philadelphia, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 10.1 · 719% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #12/14
  • PHOTO Ethan Conrad Propert…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~422 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ethan Conrad Properties (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Cescaphe Limited, L.L.C. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cescaphe Limited, L.L.C. averages 10.1 TCR (719% of the Hall and banquet room, nonresidential, rental or leasing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cescaphe Limited, L.L.C. TCR series: 2022=17.7 · 2023=2.4 · BLS 1.4

Where Cescaphe Limited, L.L.C. falls in its industry

302 Hall and banquet room, nonresi establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 14 Hall and banquet room, nonresi employers in Pennsylvania.

Cescaphe Limited, L.L.C. (422 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Cescaphe Limited, L.L.C.
Cescaphe Limited, L.L.C. (422 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Cescaphe Limited, L.L.C. has more employees than the Hall and banquet room, nonresidential, r median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.4 1.2 4 0 0
2022 17.7 0.0 27 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531120 · PA · Philadelphia

302 Hall and banquet room, nonresidential, rental or leasing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,431 employers in Philadelphia, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ethan Conrad Properties 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anchorage Convention Centers 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Community Theatre of Cedar Rapids, Inc. 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Renaissance Properties 10.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2588 422 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1623 422 FTE
STATE-SIZE JOHN HEINZ INSTITUTE OF REHAB 422 FTE
STATE-SIZE First Quality Baby Products NE 423 FTE
CITY-NEAR FIVE BELOW INC 19,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital of University of Pennsylvania 13,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Hospital 9,638 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Campus 9,129 FTE
NAT-TCR Masters Heating & Cooling, Inc. - Fort Wayne 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sunnycrest Inc. 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR HG704 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 4054-ABS-0019-0018-00536 10.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Aurora Medical Center Two Rivers 422 FTE
NAT-SIZE UCare Minnesota - 500 Stinson 422 FTE
NAT-SIZE Headquarters - PLANO TX 422 FTE
NAT-SIZE City Of Sacramento-Operations Roll-Up (120012) 422 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.