Prepared meals, perishable, packaged for individual resale · California

CFS SoCal - Anaheim

Anaheim, CA · ~44 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.0
Avg TCR
4.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CFS SoCal - Anaheim runs at 172% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Prepared meals, perishable, packaged for individual resale workplace, earning a grade D.

CFS SoCal - Anaheim: 7.0 TCR = 172% of Prepared meals, perishable, packaged for individual resale BLS 4.1 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CFS SoCal - Anaheim safety composite

CFS SoCal - Anaheim scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2017→2021

CFS SoCal - Anaheim injury rate improved

CFS SoCal - Anaheim's TCR fell 2.7 from 11.9 in 2017 to 9.2 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 11.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=11.9 · 2018=3.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=11.0 · 2021=9.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311991 · Anaheim, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.0 · 172% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #36/69
  • PHOTO True Leaf Farms SJB
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: True Leaf Farms SJB (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

CFS SoCal - Anaheim in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CFS SoCal - Anaheim averages 7.0 TCR (172% of the Prepared meals, perishable, packaged for individual resale BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CFS SoCal - Anaheim TCR series: 2017=11.9 · 2018=3 · 2019=0 · 2020=11 · 2021=9.2 · BLS 4.1

Where CFS SoCal - Anaheim falls in its industry

376 Prepared meals, perishable, pa establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 69 Prepared meals, perishable, pa employers in California.

CFS SoCal - Anaheim (44 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 179 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate CFS SoCal - Anaheim
CFS SoCal - Anaheim (44 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 179 employees and a TCR of 5.1

CFS SoCal - Anaheim has fewer employees than the Prepared meals, perishable, packaged for median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 9.2 0.0 3 0 0
2020 11.0 0.0 3 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2017 11.9 3.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311991 · CA · Anaheim

376 Prepared meals, perishable, packaged for individual resale employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 630 employers in Anaheim, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR True Leaf Farms SJB 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blount Fine Foods 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nature Soy Holdings - Folcroft 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blue Moose of Boulder 7.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Firebaugh 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Boutonnet Farms 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Coast Vineyards 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE FESTIVAL FARMS 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S. Inc., dba Disneyland Resort 38,057 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. d/b/a Disneyland Resort 28,066 FTE
CITY-NEAR Doubletree By Hilton Suites Anaheim 1,933 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08881053 ORANGE CO ANAHEIM MEDICAL CENTER 1,658 FTE
NAT-TCR ADESA Memphis 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kroger (WC USX KWO) 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Freight Lines Inc- Nashville 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Residence Inn Chicago Bloomingdale 7.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 29 RTC Little Rock 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hylite/Usblock Pensacola 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Orange Residence Inn By Marriott 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Retama Manor Nursing Center/Edinburg 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.