Skilled nursing facilities · Texas

Retama Manor Nursing Center/Edinburg

Edinburg, TX · ~44 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Retama Manor Nursing Center/Edinburg runs at 87% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Retama Manor Nursing Center/Edinburg: 5.7 TCR = 87% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Retama Manor Nursing Center/Edinburg safety composite

Retama Manor Nursing Center/Edinburg scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
D 5.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Retama Manor Nursing Center/Edinburg: 0.0 → 5.1 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 16.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.9× in 2021

Retama Manor Nursing Center/Edinburg's TCR rose 5.1 from 0.0 in 2016 to 5.1 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 16.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.9× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Edinburg, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 5.7 · 87% of ind

  • DART 5.1 DART
  • RANK #686/1034
  • PHOTO Millers Health and R…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Millers Health and Rehab (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Retama Manor Nursing Center/Edinburg in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Retama Manor Nursing Center/Edinburg averages 5.7 TCR (87% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Retama Manor Nursing Center/Edinburg TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=16.2 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=4.1 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=5.1 · BLS 6.5

Where Retama Manor Nursing Center/Edinburg falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #686 safest of 1034 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Texas.

Retama Manor Nursing Center/Edinburg (44 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Retama Manor Nursing Center/Edinburg
Retama Manor Nursing Center/Edinburg (44 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Retama Manor Nursing Center/Edinburg has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 5.1 5.1 2 0 0
2020 4.8 2.4 0 2 1
2019 4.1 4.1 2 0 0
2018 3.9 3.9 2 0 0
2017 16.2 14.1 8 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · TX · Edinburg

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 104 employers in Edinburg, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Millers Health and Rehab 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Birchrock Castle 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lutheran Home 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR AHSCM28 ALEXIAN VILLAGE MILWAUKEE 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corteva - Lubbock Research 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE WRANGLER FEED YARD 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Devon Energy Corporation - Cresson 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Driver Directional, Inc. 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Doctors Hospital at Renaissance 4,521 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Rio Grande Valley 3,315 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2576-157 743 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2576-21066000-21066 718 FTE
NAT-TCR 044 Aventura Gallery 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Shiawassee County Road Commission 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Alta Industrial Equipment Company Montgomery 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Pilot Painting & Construction 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE West Orange Residence Inn By Marriott 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE MACOM Ann Arbor 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Curry Hollow 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE CFS SoCal - Anaheim 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.