Agriculture production or harvesting crews · California

Ch Harvesting

Mcfarland, CA · ~124 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ch Harvesting runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Agriculture production or harvesting crews workplace, earning a grade C.

Ch Harvesting: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Agriculture production or harvesting crews BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ch Harvesting safety composite

Ch Harvesting scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

83/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Ch Harvesting held a steady TCR band

Ch Harvesting's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.0 TCR.

2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 115115 · Mcfarland, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/620
  • PHOTO CCH Shafter Office
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~124 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CCH Shafter Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Ch Harvesting in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ch Harvesting averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Agriculture production or harvesting crews BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ch Harvesting TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Ch Harvesting falls in its industry

836 Agriculture production or harv establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 620 Agriculture production or harv employers in California.

Ch Harvesting (124 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Ch Harvesting
Ch Harvesting (124 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Ch Harvesting has more employees than the Agriculture production or harvesting cre median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

115115 · CA · Mcfarland

836 Agriculture production or harvesting crews employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 37 employers in Mcfarland, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CCH Shafter Office 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR EB Harvesting LLC 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 918 S Del Norte, Kerman Ca 93630 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR HN Farm Labor Services, Inc 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rancho Guadalupe 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE Andrew Smith Company 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE Four Star Management LLC 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE California 124 FTE
CITY-NEAR DURAN CONTRACTING INC 2,468 FTE
CITY-NEAR PULIDO FARMS INC 991 FTE
CITY-NEAR FELIX LABOR CONTRACTING, INC 921 FTE
CITY-NEAR Greenview Farming. Inc 389 FTE
NAT-TCR Airborn Inc. Addison 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Keller Warehouse 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Raleigh Managed Services 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Carbro Constructors Corp Main 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE COB - Instruction & Special Services 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE GM Warehouse, Inc. 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE Parkway Products, LLC GRN 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE All Phase Concrete Construction Inc 124 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.