Broccoli farming, field, bedding plant and seed production · California

Rancho Guadalupe

Santa Maria, CA · ~124 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rancho Guadalupe runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Broccoli farming, field, bedding plant and seed production workplace, earning a grade A.

Rancho Guadalupe: 1.6 TCR = 36% of Broccoli farming, field, bedding plant and seed production BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rancho Guadalupe safety composite

Rancho Guadalupe scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rancho Guadalupe held a steady TCR band

Rancho Guadalupe's TCR held near 0.3 from 0.8 in 2017 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.8 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111219 · Santa Maria, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 36% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #10/175
  • PHOTO McLain Farms, Inc.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~124 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: McLain Farms, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Rancho Guadalupe in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rancho Guadalupe averages 1.6 TCR (36% of the Broccoli farming, field, bedding plant and seed production BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rancho Guadalupe TCR series: 2017=0.8 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Rancho Guadalupe falls in its industry

331 Broccoli farming, field, beddi establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 175 Broccoli farming, field, beddi employers in California.

Rancho Guadalupe (124 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Rancho Guadalupe
Rancho Guadalupe (124 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.5

Rancho Guadalupe has more employees than the Broccoli farming, field, bedding plant a median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2023 1.5 1.5 3 0 0
2022 1.3 1.3 2 0 0
2021 3.6 3.6 5 0 0
2020 2.6 2.0 3 1 0
2019 1.3 1.3 2 0 0
2018 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.8 0.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111219 · CA · Santa Maria

331 Broccoli farming, field, bedding plant and seed production employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 280 employers in Santa Maria, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR McLain Farms, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parma Seed Processing Site 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aurora Farms, LLC 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR David Peri Family Farms 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Andrew Smith Company 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE Four Star Management LLC 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE California 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE CH HARVESTING 124 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rancho Nuevo Harvesting, Inc. 2,290 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030364 2,110 FTE
CITY-NEAR 64030364-364001 MARIAN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2,074 FTE
CITY-NEAR Marian Regional Medical Center 2,021 FTE
NAT-TCR Fort Smith 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR USA NJ Edison 705000 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Warren County - All School Employees (Excluding Food Service) 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR BTW Inc 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mid-City Supply Company, Inc. 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE Endura Products Inc, Sill Plant 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA IL Matteson Plant 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE MFM Contracting Corp 124 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.