SECURITY AND AUTOMATION SERVICES · North Carolina

Cha-Cpis-South Charlotte,Nc

Charlotte, NC · ~476 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cha-Cpis-South Charlotte,Nc runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical SECURITY AND AUTOMATION SERVICES workplace, earning a grade A.

Cha-Cpis-South Charlotte,Nc: 0.6 TCR = 22% of SECURITY AND AUTOMATION SERVICES BLS 2.6 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cha-Cpis-South Charlotte,Nc safety composite

Cha-Cpis-South Charlotte,Nc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Cha-Cpis-South Charlotte,Nc held a steady TCR band

Cha-Cpis-South Charlotte,Nc's TCR held near 0.3 from 0.7 in 2017 to 0.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.7 · 2019=0.4 · 2020=1.4 · 2022=0.3 · 2023=0.2 · 2024=0.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561621 · Charlotte, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 22% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #1/7
  • PHOTO TXH-90-HOUSTON, TX
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~476 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TXH-90-HOUSTON, TX (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Cha-Cpis-South Charlotte,Nc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cha-Cpis-South Charlotte,Nc averages 0.6 TCR (22% of the SECURITY AND AUTOMATION SERVICES BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cha-Cpis-South Charlotte,Nc TCR series: 2017=0.7 · 2019=0.4 · 2020=1.4 · 2022=0.3 · 2023=0.2 · 2024=0.4 · BLS 2.6

Where Cha-Cpis-South Charlotte,Nc falls in its industry

161 SECURITY AND AUTOMATION SERVIC establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 7 SECURITY AND AUTOMATION SERVIC employers in North Carolina.

Cha-Cpis-South Charlotte,Nc (476 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Cha-Cpis-South Charlotte,Nc
Cha-Cpis-South Charlotte,Nc (476 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Cha-Cpis-South Charlotte,Nc has more employees than the SECURITY AND AUTOMATION SERVICES median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.4 0.4 2 0 0
2023 0.2 0.2 1 0 0
2022 0.3 0.3 2 0 0
2020 1.4 1.4 6 0 0
2019 0.4 0.4 2 0 0
2017 0.7 0.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561621 · NC · Charlotte

161 SECURITY AND AUTOMATION SERVICES employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TXH-90-HOUSTON, TX 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR East Long Meadow FS (GTS, HTSG) 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Miramar FS (SSS,CSS) 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Securitec One, Inc. 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE PBV-Western Operations Warehouse 476 FTE
STATE-SIZE Woodgrain - Rocky Mount 476 FTE
STATE-SIZE Patheon Softgels Inc 475 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greiner Bio One North America Inc 477 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Force Pressure Control, LLC 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR WNA Houston 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Berry Global - Monroe, LA 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR AVL Systems, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Westin New York at Times Square 476 FTE
NAT-SIZE Univ of Pgh Cancer Inst Cancer Services 476 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pensacola Mill 476 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of South Gate 476 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.