Spring waters, purifying and bottling · California

Chameleon Beverage Company

Commerce, CA · ~72 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chameleon Beverage Company runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Spring waters, purifying and bottling workplace, earning a grade B.

Chameleon Beverage Company: 2.4 TCR = 73% of Spring waters, purifying and bottling BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chameleon Beverage Company safety composite

Chameleon Beverage Company scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.4

2019→2024

Chameleon Beverage Company injury rate improved

Chameleon Beverage Company's TCR fell 6.4 from 6.4 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=6.4 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 312112 · Commerce, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 73% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #15/31
  • PHOTO Niagara Bottling, LL…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~72 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Niagara Bottling, LLC - Milesburg (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Chameleon Beverage Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chameleon Beverage Company averages 2.4 TCR (73% of the Spring waters, purifying and bottling BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chameleon Beverage Company TCR series: 2019=6.4 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Chameleon Beverage Company falls in its industry

192 Spring waters, purifying and b establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 31 Spring waters, purifying and b employers in California.

Chameleon Beverage Company (72 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 98 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Chameleon Beverage Company
Chameleon Beverage Company (72 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 98 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Chameleon Beverage Company has fewer employees than the Spring waters, purifying and bottling median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.6 2.6 2 0 0
2022 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2021 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2020 2.8 2.8 2 0 0
2019 6.4 3.9 5 0 1

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

312112 · CA · Commerce

192 Spring waters, purifying and bottling employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 163 employers in Commerce, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Niagara Bottling, LLC - Milesburg 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crystal Geyser Water Company of Calistoga, California 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Culligan of Springfield 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Niagara Bottling, LLC - Hamburg 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Monterey Pacific, LLC 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arts Ranch 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mellano & Company - Los Angeles Wholesale House 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greg Hooker dba Diamond H Dairy 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ferguson Complex 2,769 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 587 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR PCAM, LLC 1,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DLA3 771 FTE
NAT-TCR Raven Stream Elementary School 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR South University Clinic 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR CenterPoint Energy - Brazoria 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Star of the West Milling Co - Richville, MI 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE RJV Construction Corp. 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE 11680 Hayden Road 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elliott Machine Shop 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE 304 Colorado Meats 72 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.