Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) dealers, direct selling · Maine

Champagne Energy - Arundel

Arundel, ME · ~39 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.5
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Champagne Energy - Arundel runs at 309% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) dealers, direct selling workplace, earning a grade F.

Champagne Energy - Arundel: 10.5 TCR = 309% of Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) dealers, direct selling BLS 3.4 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Champagne Energy - Arundel safety composite

Champagne Energy - Arundel scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.3

2020→2024

Champagne Energy - Arundel injury rate improved

Champagne Energy - Arundel's TCR fell 8.3 from 21.1 in 2020 to 12.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 21.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=21.1 · 2021=5.7 · 2022=6.2 · 2023=6.7 · 2024=12.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 454310 · Arundel, ME ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.5 · 309% of ind

  • DART 12.8 DART
  • RANK #29/39
  • PHOTO 8800-DRC-NORTH HAVER…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 8800-DRC-NORTH HAVERHILL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maine employers → · Look up another →

Champagne Energy - Arundel in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Champagne Energy - Arundel averages 10.5 TCR (309% of the Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) dealers, direct selling BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Champagne Energy - Arundel TCR series: 2020=21.1 · 2021=5.7 · 2022=6.2 · 2023=6.7 · 2024=12.8 · BLS 3.4

Where Champagne Energy - Arundel falls in its industry

366 Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maine alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 39 Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) employers in Maine.

Champagne Energy - Arundel (39 employees, TCR 10.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 33 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Champagne Energy - Arundel
Champagne Energy - Arundel (39 employees, TCR 10.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 33 employees and a TCR of 6.1

Champagne Energy - Arundel has more employees than the Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) dealers, d median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.8 12.8 3 0 0
2023 6.7 6.7 2 0 0
2022 6.2 3.1 2 0 0
2021 5.7 2.9 2 0 0
2020 21.1 14.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

454310 · ME · Arundel

366 Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) dealers, direct selling employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,397 rated employers in Maine with headcount on file · 4 employers in Arundel, ME · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 8800-DRC-NORTH HAVERHILL 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rymes Propane - Pembroke 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sail Energy LLC DBA Tower Energy 10.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR SHAFFERS BOTTLED GAS, INC 10.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE TNT Road Company, Inc. 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Auburn Manufacturing, Inc. MF 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Purestat Eng. 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1350,3270,8489 KAO 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arundel Machine Tool Inc 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR Terrapin Landscapes 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Douston Construction 22 FTE
NAT-TCR R32 Orlando FL 10.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Pontrelli & Laricchia 10.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Mac Industries, Inc. 10.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 8001 10.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Louisiana-Pacific St. Louis 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE NFI Interactive Logistics LLC-1 SEA BOX DRIVE 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sutton-Garten Company 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rancho Cienega District Maint. 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.