Concrete pumping (i.e., placement) · Idaho

Champion Concrete Pumping, Inc.

Hauser, ID · ~53 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Champion Concrete Pumping, Inc. runs at 274% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Concrete pumping (i.e., placement) workplace, earning a grade F.

Champion Concrete Pumping, Inc.: 7.7 TCR = 274% of Concrete pumping (i.e., placement) BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Champion Concrete Pumping, Inc. safety composite

Champion Concrete Pumping, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2016→2024

Champion Concrete Pumping, Inc. injury rate improved

Champion Concrete Pumping, Inc.'s TCR fell 0.8 from 9.2 in 2016 to 8.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 10.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.2 · 2017=7.4 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=10.0 · 2020=8.1 · 2021=7.1 · 2022=10.1 · 2023=5.4 · 2024=8.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238110 · Hauser, ID ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.7 · 274% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #5/10
  • PHOTO Forcine Concrete & C…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Forcine Concrete & Construction Co Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Idaho employers → · Look up another →

Champion Concrete Pumping, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Champion Concrete Pumping, Inc. averages 7.7 TCR (274% of the Concrete pumping (i.e., placement) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Champion Concrete Pumping, Inc. TCR series: 2016=9.2 · 2017=7.4 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=10 · 2020=8.1 · 2021=7.1 · 2022=10.1 · 2023=5.4 · 2024=8.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Champion Concrete Pumping, Inc. falls in its industry

1,314 Concrete pumping (i.e., placem establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Idaho alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 10 Concrete pumping (i.e., placem employers in Idaho.

Champion Concrete Pumping, Inc. (53 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Champion Concrete Pumping, Inc.
Champion Concrete Pumping, Inc. (53 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Champion Concrete Pumping, Inc. has fewer employees than the Concrete pumping (i.e., placement) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.3 4.2 6 0 0
2023 5.4 1.3 4 0 0
2022 10.1 2.9 7 0 0
2021 7.1 2.8 5 0 0
2020 8.1 4.9 5 0 0
2019 10.0 6.7 6 0 0
2018 3.5 1.7 1 1 0
2017 7.4 5.6 4 0 0
2016 9.2 6.9 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238110 · ID · Hauser

1,314 Concrete pumping (i.e., placement) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,774 rated employers in Idaho with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Forcine Concrete & Construction Co Inc 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gunite Specialists, Inc 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Burgess Concrete Construction, Inc 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Builders Plus Construction, LLC 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE FDC-Glenns Ferry 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Seneca Foods Corporation 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Streamline Precision Contracting, LLC 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Heyburn Facility 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Real Alloy Recycling LLC 35 FTE
NAT-TCR Lake Assault Boats, LLC 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Bryant 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Yuma Ethanol 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DTU3 7.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Artis Senior Living of Commack 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Eckerd College Grounds 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3393 - LA Bonnie Brae 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE DD Day Hab 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.