Casings, sausage, nonrigid plastics, manufacturing · Colorado

Champion Window of Colorado Springs

Colorado Springs, CO · ~29 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Champion Window of Colorado Springs runs at 242% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Casings, sausage, nonrigid plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Champion Window of Colorado Springs: 8.0 TCR = 242% of Casings, sausage, nonrigid plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Champion Window of Colorado Springs safety composite

Champion Window of Colorado Springs scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Champion Window of Colorado Springs: 6.0 → 12.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 12.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.8× in 2024

Champion Window of Colorado Springs's TCR rose 6.8 from 6.0 in 2016 to 12.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326121 · Colorado Springs, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.0 · 242% of ind

  • DART 6.4 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO Atkore United Poly S…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Atkore United Poly Systems (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Champion Window of Colorado Springs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Champion Window of Colorado Springs averages 8.0 TCR (242% of the Casings, sausage, nonrigid plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Champion Window of Colorado Springs TCR series: 2016=6 · 2017=5.1 · 2024=12.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Champion Window of Colorado Springs falls in its industry

202 Casings, sausage, nonrigid pla establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Casings, sausage, nonrigid pla employers in Colorado.

Champion Window of Colorado Springs (29 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Champion Window of Colorado Springs
Champion Window of Colorado Springs (29 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Champion Window of Colorado Springs has fewer employees than the Casings, sausage, nonrigid plastics, man median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.8 6.4 2 0 0
2017 5.1 5.1 1 0 0
2016 6.0 6.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326121 · CO · Colorado Springs

202 Casings, sausage, nonrigid plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 832 employers in Colorado Springs, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Atkore United Poly Systems 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Freelin-Wade Co. 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Polygon US6 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parkway Products Ft. Collins Colorado 7.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Allied Potato Colorado 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Soli Organic Inc. - Denver 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Veeman Dairy, LLLP 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Comanche 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Colorado Hospital Memorial Central 3,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DEN4 2,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penrose Hospital 2,841 FTE
CITY-NEAR 05070001-050701 PENROSE HOSPITAL 2,391 FTE
NAT-TCR Pepper Incorporated 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hidden View Dairy, LLC 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR GTA Containers, LLC. 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rock Prairie Dairy LLC 8.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wilderness View 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ridge View 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Country View 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sweetwater Retirement Community 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.