Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing · Oregon

Freelin-Wade Co.

Mcminnville, OR · ~106 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Freelin-Wade Co. runs at 240% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Freelin-Wade Co.: 7.9 TCR = 240% of Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Freelin-Wade Co. safety composite

Freelin-Wade Co. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Freelin-Wade Co.: 6.2 → 8.2 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 11.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.04× in 2024

Freelin-Wade Co.'s TCR rose 2.0 from 6.2 in 2017 to 8.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 11.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.04× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326121 · Mcminnville, OR ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.9 · 240% of ind

  • DART 8.2 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO Atkore United Poly S…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 62 inj
  • SIZE ~106 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Atkore United Poly Systems (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Freelin-Wade Co. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Freelin-Wade Co. averages 7.9 TCR (240% of the Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Freelin-Wade Co. TCR series: 2017=6.2 · 2018=7.9 · 2019=6 · 2020=7.1 · 2021=5.7 · 2022=11.2 · 2023=10.8 · 2024=8.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Freelin-Wade Co. falls in its industry

202 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tub establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tub employers in Oregon.

Freelin-Wade Co. (106 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Freelin-Wade Co.
Freelin-Wade Co. (106 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Freelin-Wade Co. has more employees than the Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrig median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.2 8.2 7 0 0
2023 10.8 7.2 9 0 0
2022 11.2 1.7 13 0 0
2021 5.7 5.7 6 0 0
2020 7.1 5.4 6 2 0
2019 6.0 5.0 6 0 0
2018 7.9 6.9 8 0 0
2017 6.2 4.5 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326121 · OR · Mcminnville

202 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 94 employers in Mcminnville, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Atkore United Poly Systems 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Champion Window of Colorado Springs 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Polygon US6 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parkway Products Ft. Collins Colorado 7.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE 00457 GRAPE STREET OFC 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main Office 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE Anning-Johnson Company Oregon 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cascade Acoustics, Inc. 106 FTE
CITY-NEAR Linfield College 943 FTE
CITY-NEAR WILLAMETTE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER 610 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cascade Steel Rolling Mills 400 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSS McMinnville 397 FTE
NAT-TCR Southern Cast Inc. 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Xpress Boats 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Industrial Performance Group of South Carolina, INC. 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sippel Co., Inc. dba Sippel Steel Fab 7.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wiegmann Associates 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Classic at Hillcrest Greens 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Zero Zone, Inc.-Waukesha 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE RI Office 106 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.