Community health centers and clinics, outpatient · California

Chapa-De Indian Health Program, Inc.

Auburn, CA · ~266 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chapa-De Indian Health Program, Inc. runs at 161% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Community health centers and clinics, outpatient workplace, earning a grade D.

Chapa-De Indian Health Program, Inc.: 6.1 TCR = 161% of Community health centers and clinics, outpatient BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chapa-De Indian Health Program, Inc. safety composite

Chapa-De Indian Health Program, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Chapa-De Indian Health Program, Inc.: 2.1 → 10.2 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 10.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.26× in 2023

Chapa-De Indian Health Program, Inc.'s TCR rose 8.1 from 2.1 in 2020 to 10.2 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621498 · Auburn, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.1 · 161% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #80/132
  • PHOTO Harbortown Clinic
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~266 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Harbortown Clinic (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Chapa-De Indian Health Program, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chapa-De Indian Health Program, Inc. averages 6.1 TCR (161% of the Community health centers and clinics, outpatient BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chapa-De Indian Health Program, Inc. TCR series: 2020=2.1 · 2023=10.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Chapa-De Indian Health Program, Inc. falls in its industry

599 Community health centers and c establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #80 safest of 132 Community health centers and c employers in California.

Chapa-De Indian Health Program, Inc. (266 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Chapa-De Indian Health Program, Inc.
Chapa-De Indian Health Program, Inc. (266 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Chapa-De Indian Health Program, Inc. has more employees than the Community health centers and clinics, ou median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 10.2 1.6 18 1 0
2020 2.1 0.8 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621498 · CA · Auburn

599 Community health centers and clinics, outpatient employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 96 employers in Auburn, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Harbortown Clinic 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sutter Outpatient Services, LLC (600-90) 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Black Hills Imaging Center 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR One Community Health 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ratto Bros Inc 266 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cassin Ranch 266 FTE
STATE-SIZE Moonlight Packing Company, LLC Plant 1 266 FTE
STATE-SIZE CANUS Services, Inc. 266 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 37 2,161 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Valley Hospitals (30095) 762 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health and Human Services 743 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Auburn Faith Hospital (110-4001) 676 FTE
NAT-TCR Food City 089 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Progressive Pipe Fabricators 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #547 TAMPA, FL 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Queens Regional Office 6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Market Basket #86 266 FTE
NAT-SIZE 009-FF01-MARSHFIELD 266 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vitalant AZ Scottsdale 266 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unified Brands 266 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.