Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) · Florida

Charles Britt Academy

St. Petersburg, FL · ~43 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Charles Britt Academy runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) workplace, earning a grade A.

Charles Britt Academy: 1.6 TCR = 43% of Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Charles Britt Academy safety composite

Charles Britt Academy scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Charles Britt Academy held a steady TCR band

Charles Britt Academy's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=5.1 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623990 · St. Petersburg, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 43% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/42
  • PHOTO Livonia Corporate Ce…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Livonia Corporate Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Charles Britt Academy in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Charles Britt Academy averages 1.6 TCR (43% of the Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Charles Britt Academy TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=5.1 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Charles Britt Academy falls in its industry

560 Boys' and girls' residential f establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 42 Boys' and girls' residential f employers in Florida.

Charles Britt Academy (43 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Charles Britt Academy
Charles Britt Academy (43 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4

Charles Britt Academy has fewer employees than the Boys' and girls' residential facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 5.1 5.1 1 0 0
2019 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623990 · FL · St. Petersburg

560 Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 170 employers in St. Petersburg, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Livonia Corporate Center 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 582787 181382_TX TYLER 6589 OAK HILL BLVD_NEURO 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Global Family Care Network 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR GREEFL-INC-GREENVILLE,FL - FLORIDA 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE PINTO'S FARM 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fernlea Nurseries - STU 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE DRP Boca Raton Service Center 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stuart Office 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital 3,433 FTE
CITY-NEAR HSN Headquarters 3,128 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Anthony's Hospital (1105) 2,597 FTE
CITY-NEAR Power Design Inc 2,047 FTE
NAT-TCR Livonia Corporate Center 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Duna USA Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Delta Flight Products - Headquarters 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR WJS 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE DPW Fleet Managment Services 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE White Castle System, Inc. - Rensselaer Bakery 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Temperature Systems - Green Bay 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Multi-Color Corporation - Fulton 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.