Furnaces, warm air (i.e., forced air), merchant wholesalers · Wisconsin

Temperature Systems - Green Bay

Green Bay, WI · ~43 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Temperature Systems - Green Bay runs at 27% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Furnaces, warm air (i.e., forced air), merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade A.

Temperature Systems - Green Bay: 0.6 TCR = 27% of Furnaces, warm air (i.e., forced air), merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Temperature Systems - Green Bay safety composite

Temperature Systems - Green Bay scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2018→2021

Temperature Systems - Green Bay injury rate improved

Temperature Systems - Green Bay's TCR fell 2.4 from 2.4 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.4 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.4 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423730 · Green Bay, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 27% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/11
  • PHOTO AP Air, Inc.
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AP Air, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Temperature Systems - Green Bay in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Temperature Systems - Green Bay averages 0.6 TCR (27% of the Furnaces, warm air (i.e., forced air), merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Temperature Systems - Green Bay TCR series: 2018=2.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Temperature Systems - Green Bay falls in its industry

290 Furnaces, warm air (i.e., forc establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 11 Furnaces, warm air (i.e., forc employers in Wisconsin.

Temperature Systems - Green Bay (43 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Temperature Systems - Green Bay
Temperature Systems - Green Bay (43 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Temperature Systems - Green Bay has fewer employees than the Furnaces, warm air (i.e., forced air), m median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423730 · WI · Green Bay

290 Furnaces, warm air (i.e., forced air), merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 563 employers in Green Bay, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AP Air, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hoffman & Hoffman, Inc - Greensboro 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4192-00051423-DCP 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Motili, Inc. - NY 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Holsum Irish Dairy 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barron Hatchery 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Babcock Receiving 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Riverside Generating Station 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR WI005 - WI-Green Bay-CSBC 3,595 FTE
CITY-NEAR WI-Green Bay-CSBC 3,296 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital Campus 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR 300000170855522 - WI-Green Bay-CSBC 2,379 FTE
NAT-TCR Multi-Color Corporation - Scottsburg 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Cal-Maine Food, Inc.- Klesel Complex 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Midwest Disability - Coon Rapids 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR TMEIC-KATY 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Multi-Color Corporation - Fulton 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE DPW Fleet Managment Services 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Charles Britt Academy 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clifton Assisted Living 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.