Steel forgings made from purchased steel, unfinished · Illinois

Charles E. Larson & Sons, Inc.

Chicago, IL · ~63 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Charles E. Larson & Sons, Inc. runs at 85% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Steel forgings made from purchased steel, unfinished workplace, earning a grade C.

Charles E. Larson & Sons, Inc.: 2.8 TCR = 85% of Steel forgings made from purchased steel, unfinished BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Charles E. Larson & Sons, Inc. safety composite

Charles E. Larson & Sons, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Charles E. Larson & Sons, Inc.: 2.0 → 3.9 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 5.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Charles E. Larson & Sons, Inc.'s TCR rose 1.8 from 2.0 in 2017 to 3.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332111 · Chicago, IL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 85% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/19
  • PHOTO Whitcraft LLC
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Whitcraft LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Charles E. Larson & Sons, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Charles E. Larson & Sons, Inc. averages 2.8 TCR (85% of the Steel forgings made from purchased steel, unfinished BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Charles E. Larson & Sons, Inc. TCR series: 2017=2 · 2018=4.9 · 2019=1 · 2021=5 · 2022=0 · 2024=3.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Charles E. Larson & Sons, Inc. falls in its industry

241 Steel forgings made from purch establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 19 Steel forgings made from purch employers in Illinois.

Charles E. Larson & Sons, Inc. (63 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Charles E. Larson & Sons, Inc.
Charles E. Larson & Sons, Inc. (63 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 5.0

Charles E. Larson & Sons, Inc. has fewer employees than the Steel forgings made from purchased steel median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.9 0.0 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 5.0 2.5 2 0 0
2019 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2018 4.9 4.9 5 0 0
2017 2.0 2.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332111 · IL · Chicago

241 Steel forgings made from purchased steel, unfinished employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Whitcraft LLC 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Cold Forge 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meritor 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oxford Forge 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Waterman, IL-STC 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hinsdale Nurseries, Inc. Plano 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE 40L - IL Relay & Ops 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Water/Public Works, Public Utiities 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR Fisher Auto Parts - DYTNOH 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Rialto Plant #24 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Concrete Technologies, Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sutherlands Home Base - Nevada 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Klink Trucking Ashley 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hales Sand & Gravel 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Concordia Electric Cooperative 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lone Star Grading & Materials, LLC 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.