Cold forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished · Ohio

American Cold Forge

Northwood, OH · ~28 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

American Cold Forge runs at 86% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Cold forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished workplace, earning a grade C.

American Cold Forge: 2.8 TCR = 86% of Cold forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

American Cold Forge safety composite

American Cold Forge scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.3

2016→2024

American Cold Forge injury rate improved

American Cold Forge's TCR fell 7.3 from 7.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.3 · 2017=6.9 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332111 · Northwood, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 86% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/41
  • PHOTO Meritor
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Meritor (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

American Cold Forge in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows American Cold Forge averages 2.8 TCR (86% of the Cold forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

American Cold Forge TCR series: 2016=7.3 · 2017=6.9 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where American Cold Forge falls in its industry

241 Cold forgings made from purcha establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 41 Cold forgings made from purcha employers in Ohio.

American Cold Forge (28 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate American Cold Forge
American Cold Forge (28 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 5.0

American Cold Forge has fewer employees than the Cold forgings made from purchased iron o median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.1 4.1 1 0 0
2022 3.9 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.3 0.0 1 0 0
2017 6.9 3.4 2 0 0
2016 7.3 7.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332111 · OH · Northwood

241 Cold forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 46 employers in Northwood, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Meritor 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Whitcraft LLC 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Charles E. Larson & Sons, Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Auburn Hills Manufacturing 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE H and M Building 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fine Oak Farm 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Case Farms Canton Hatchery 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Small's Sand & Gravel, Inc. 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Norplas Industries 1,180 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buckeye Broadband 685 FTE
CITY-NEAR Adient Northwood Ohio 504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Adient LLC 447 FTE
NAT-TCR Peco Foods Inc.-Poultry Processing Plant 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Fernley (Polyiso) 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Store #43 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR CK Contractors & Development North Carolina 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Downingtown Plant 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE State Line Combined Cycle 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Columbus 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Lafayette 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.