Fiber optic cable made from purchased fiber optic strand · North Carolina

Charlotte Headquarters

Charlotte, NC · ~652 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Charlotte Headquarters runs at 3% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Fiber optic cable made from purchased fiber optic strand workplace, earning a grade A.

Charlotte Headquarters: 0.1 TCR = 3% of Fiber optic cable made from purchased fiber optic strand BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Charlotte Headquarters safety composite

Charlotte Headquarters scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Charlotte Headquarters held a steady TCR band

Charlotte Headquarters's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 0.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=0.2 · 2022=0.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335921 · Charlotte, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 3% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/15
  • PHOTO Hickory Headquarters
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~652 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hickory Headquarters (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Charlotte Headquarters in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Charlotte Headquarters averages 0.1 TCR (3% of the Fiber optic cable made from purchased fiber optic strand BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Charlotte Headquarters TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=0.2 · 2022=0.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Charlotte Headquarters falls in its industry

49 Fiber optic cable made from pu establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 15 Fiber optic cable made from pu employers in North Carolina.

Charlotte Headquarters (652 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 111 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Charlotte Headquarters
Charlotte Headquarters (652 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 111 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Charlotte Headquarters has more employees than the Fiber optic cable made from purchased fi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.1 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.2 0.2 2 0 0
2020 0.4 0.3 4 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335921 · NC · Charlotte

49 Fiber optic cable made from purchased fiber optic strand employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hickory Headquarters 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR DATAONE SYSTEMS 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prysmian Cables & Systems USA, LLC 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ortronics Inc. 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Butterball LLC, Raeford 651 FTE
STATE-SIZE 71101 651 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0050-Atrium Health Lincoln 653 FTE
STATE-SIZE Reynolds Consumer Products - Huntersville Tableware Plant 650 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Field Work 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Structsure Scaffold Solutions LLC 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR TKC Highland 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR The People Concern - Mosaic Westlake 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE DLLSTXAK 652 FTE
NAT-SIZE DLLSTX18 652 FTE
NAT-SIZE Venture Community Services 652 FTE
NAT-SIZE 119466-West Palm Beach Fl P&Dc 652 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.