Fiber optic cable made from purchased fiber optic strand · South Carolina

Prysmian Cables & Systems USA, LLC

Lexington, SC · ~325 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Prysmian Cables & Systems USA, LLC runs at 6% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Fiber optic cable made from purchased fiber optic strand workplace, earning a grade A.

Prysmian Cables & Systems USA, LLC: 0.2 TCR = 6% of Fiber optic cable made from purchased fiber optic strand BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Prysmian Cables & Systems USA, LLC safety composite

Prysmian Cables & Systems USA, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2022→2023

Prysmian Cables & Systems USA, LLC injury rate improved

Prysmian Cables & Systems USA, LLC's TCR fell 0.4 from 0.4 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=0.4 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335921 · Lexington, SC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 6% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/6
  • PHOTO DATAONE SYSTEMS
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~325 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DATAONE SYSTEMS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Prysmian Cables & Systems USA, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Prysmian Cables & Systems USA, LLC averages 0.2 TCR (6% of the Fiber optic cable made from purchased fiber optic strand BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Prysmian Cables & Systems USA, LLC TCR series: 2022=0.4 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Prysmian Cables & Systems USA, LLC falls in its industry

49 Fiber optic cable made from pu establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 6 Fiber optic cable made from pu employers in South Carolina.

Prysmian Cables & Systems USA, LLC (325 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 111 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Prysmian Cables & Systems USA, LLC
Prysmian Cables & Systems USA, LLC (325 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 111 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Prysmian Cables & Systems USA, LLC has more employees than the Fiber optic cable made from purchased fi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.4 0.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335921 · SC · Lexington

49 Fiber optic cable made from purchased fiber optic strand employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 136 employers in Lexington, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DATAONE SYSTEMS 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hickory Headquarters 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Charlotte Headquarters 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ortronics Inc. 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE JW Aluminum - Mt. Holly 325 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chester Plywood - WP 324 FTE
STATE-SIZE CRM Liberty SC 326 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1123 324 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Lexington 1,630 FTE
CITY-NEAR Michelin US5 Lexington SC 1,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR Michelin North America US7 838 FTE
CITY-NEAR Columbia 760 FTE
NAT-TCR HoneywellMI11 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Diagnostics : Leica Biosystems (Aperio) - Vista 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR FIS Operations, LLC dba Frontier Integrity Solutions 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR James Hardie Building Products Chicago Office 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE asplundh tree experts 325 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southeast Georgia Health System Camden Campus 325 FTE
NAT-SIZE Location 19039 325 FTE
NAT-SIZE Horizons Window Fashions 325 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.