Temporary staffing services · North Carolina

Charlotte Labor Source

High Point, NC · ~83 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Charlotte Labor Source runs at 204% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Temporary staffing services workplace, earning a grade F.

Charlotte Labor Source: 5.3 TCR = 204% of Temporary staffing services BLS 2.6 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Charlotte Labor Source safety composite

Charlotte Labor Source scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2017→2024

Charlotte Labor Source injury rate improved

Charlotte Labor Source's TCR fell 3.4 from 6.3 in 2017 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 9.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.3 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=9.5 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=9.0 · 2024=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561320 · High Point, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.3 · 204% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #18/23
  • PHOTO General Healthcare R…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~83 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: General Healthcare Resources LLC - 7 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Charlotte Labor Source in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Charlotte Labor Source averages 5.3 TCR (204% of the Temporary staffing services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Charlotte Labor Source TCR series: 2017=6.3 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=9.5 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=9 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 2.6

Where Charlotte Labor Source falls in its industry

652 Temporary staffing services establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 23 Temporary staffing services employers in North Carolina.

Charlotte Labor Source (83 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 197 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Charlotte Labor Source
Charlotte Labor Source (83 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 197 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Charlotte Labor Source has fewer employees than the Temporary staffing services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 1.4 2 0 0
2023 9.0 9.0 5 0 0
2022 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2021 4.1 4.1 2 0 0
2020 4.5 4.5 4 0 0
2019 9.5 9.5 7 0 0
2018 3.5 3.5 2 0 0
2017 6.3 6.3 3 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561320 · NC · High Point

652 Temporary staffing services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 243 employers in High Point, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR General Healthcare Resources LLC - 7 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR ChildCare Careers 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR STAFF MATTERS INC 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 8010531 Fourth Street Barbecue 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE ROCKWELL FARMS INC 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gastonia Operations Center 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Greensboro 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Raleigh-Durham Call Center 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR WFBMC - High Point Medical Center 1,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR CITY OF HIGH POINT 1,532 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thomas Built Buses 1,467 FTE
CITY-NEAR High Point Medical Center 1,370 FTE
NAT-TCR Elko 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR KTA Super Stores - Waimea 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Burgess Health Center 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Fury Stillwater 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Ranch Winery 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Concrete Paving Overhead East (7101) 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Perdue Environmental Contracting Co., Inc. 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Renaissance Indianapolis North 83 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.