Specialized Freight (except Used Goods) Trucking, Long-Distance · North Carolina

Charlotte Trucking Terminal

Charlotte, NC · ~22 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Charlotte Trucking Terminal runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Specialized Freight (except Used Goods) Trucking, Long-Distance workplace, earning a grade B.

Charlotte Trucking Terminal: 3.0 TCR = 66% of Specialized Freight (except Used Goods) Trucking, Long-Distance BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Charlotte Trucking Terminal safety composite

Charlotte Trucking Terminal scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Charlotte Trucking Terminal: 0.0 → 3.7 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 7.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.24× in 2022

Charlotte Trucking Terminal's TCR rose 3.7 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.7 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484230 · Charlotte, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.0 · 66% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #11/33
  • PHOTO Chief Carriers
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chief Carriers (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Charlotte Trucking Terminal in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Charlotte Trucking Terminal averages 3.0 TCR (66% of the Specialized Freight (except Used Goods) Trucking, Long-Distance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Charlotte Trucking Terminal TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=7 · 2022=3.7 · BLS 4.5

Where Charlotte Trucking Terminal falls in its industry

1,026 Specialized Freight (except Us establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 33 Specialized Freight (except Us employers in North Carolina.

Charlotte Trucking Terminal (22 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Charlotte Trucking Terminal
Charlotte Trucking Terminal (22 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Charlotte Trucking Terminal has fewer employees than the Specialized Freight (except Used Goods) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.7 3.7 1 0 0
2021 7.0 7.0 2 0 0
2020 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2017 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484230 · NC · Charlotte

1,026 Specialized Freight (except Used Goods) Trucking, Long-Distance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chief Carriers 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hilco Transport Selma 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dedicated - Dollar General Lebec 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR D. Mosley Trucking, Inc. 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE A Plus Farms, Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rock Ridge Farms Partnership 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vanguard Farms, Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE LNM - 105 -EST 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Cumming 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR MedVet Commerce 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR P9 - Fitchburg 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Mauser Packaging Solutions 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE U709-90 Geiger Road 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Columbus Grain Elevator 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Morton Manufacturing 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Comfort Suites Marietta 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.