Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Washington

Charlton Place Assisted Living

Tacoma, WA · ~36 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Charlton Place Assisted Living runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Charlton Place Assisted Living: 2.2 TCR = 58% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Charlton Place Assisted Living safety composite

Charlton Place Assisted Living scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 2.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Charlton Place Assisted Living: 0.0 → 4.4 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 75.0 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2023

Charlton Place Assisted Living's TCR rose 4.4 from 0.0 in 2020 to 4.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 75.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Tacoma, WA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 58% of ind

  • DART 4.4 DART
  • RANK #13/216
  • PHOTO SPRING ARBOR COTTAGE…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SPRING ARBOR COTTAGE OF RICHMOND (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Charlton Place Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Charlton Place Assisted Living averages 2.2 TCR (58% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Charlton Place Assisted Living TCR series: 2020=0 · 2022=75 · 2023=4.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Charlton Place Assisted Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 216 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Washington.

Charlton Place Assisted Living (36 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Charlton Place Assisted Living
Charlton Place Assisted Living (36 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Charlton Place Assisted Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.4 4.4 1 0 0
2022 75.0 75.0 14 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WA · Tacoma

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 445 employers in Tacoma, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SPRING ARBOR COTTAGE OF RICHMOND 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inspired Senior Living of Hanover 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Homestead Assisted Living 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Canyon Lakes 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Skyridge Farms 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE J&K Dairy, LLC 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Friesland Dairy LLC 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE FV Blue North 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tacoma General Hospital (Companied 10 & 20) 3,718 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Tacoma 3,689 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tacoma General Hospital 3,247 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-46080001-460801 3,061 FTE
NAT-TCR Maax Bath Plymouth 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Montebello Ca Plant 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Bedford Specialty Care 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Ericco Mfg 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Department of Iron Range Resources & Rehabilitation - Eveleth 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metal Sales MC - Bay City 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE ELECTRIC 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arc Allegany-Steuben-East Main 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.