Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Virginia

Spring Arbor Cottage of Richmond

Richmond, VA · ~44 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Spring Arbor Cottage of Richmond runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Spring Arbor Cottage of Richmond: 2.2 TCR = 58% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Spring Arbor Cottage of Richmond safety composite

Spring Arbor Cottage of Richmond scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 2.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Spring Arbor Cottage of Richmond: 0.0 → 2.8 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 3.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.25× in 2024

Spring Arbor Cottage of Richmond's TCR rose 2.8 from 0.0 in 2022 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Richmond, VA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 58% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #21/199
  • PHOTO Inspired Senior Livi…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Inspired Senior Living of Hanover (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Spring Arbor Cottage of Richmond in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Spring Arbor Cottage of Richmond averages 2.2 TCR (58% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Spring Arbor Cottage of Richmond TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Spring Arbor Cottage of Richmond falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 199 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Virginia.

Spring Arbor Cottage of Richmond (44 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Spring Arbor Cottage of Richmond
Spring Arbor Cottage of Richmond (44 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Spring Arbor Cottage of Richmond has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2023 3.9 1.9 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · VA · Richmond

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 939 employers in Richmond, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Inspired Senior Living of Hanover 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Homestead Assisted Living 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Charlton Place Assisted Living 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Canyon Lakes 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE DSTC CHESTER 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harrisonburg Electric Commission 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE TIS VA Culpeper 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Avis Construction Company 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR VCU Health System 14,536 FTE
CITY-NEAR Virginia Commonwealth University 11,826 FTE
CITY-NEAR VCU 5,271 FTE
CITY-NEAR CJW Medical Center 3,259 FTE
NAT-TCR 10696 One Wall Street 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 731-PL001 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR First Student 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Haemonetics-Clinton 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Community Hospice of Saratoga 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Westbrook Depot 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE PCC Contracting 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eau Claire Wood Recycling - 1078 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.