Film, plastics, packaging, manufacturing · Wisconsin

Charter Next Generation, Inc - Bloomer

Bloomer, WI · ~126 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Charter Next Generation, Inc - Bloomer runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Film, plastics, packaging, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Charter Next Generation, Inc - Bloomer: 2.1 TCR = 62% of Film, plastics, packaging, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Charter Next Generation, Inc - Bloomer safety composite

Charter Next Generation, Inc - Bloomer scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2021→2024

Charter Next Generation, Inc - Bloomer injury rate improved

Charter Next Generation, Inc - Bloomer's TCR fell 0.8 from 2.7 in 2021 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=2.7 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326112 · Bloomer, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 62% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #26/50
  • PHOTO Bonset America Corpo…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~126 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bonset America Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Charter Next Generation, Inc - Bloomer in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Charter Next Generation, Inc - Bloomer averages 2.1 TCR (62% of the Film, plastics, packaging, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Charter Next Generation, Inc - Bloomer TCR series: 2021=2.7 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Charter Next Generation, Inc - Bloomer falls in its industry

396 Film, plastics, packaging, man establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 50 Film, plastics, packaging, man employers in Wisconsin.

Charter Next Generation, Inc - Bloomer (126 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 90 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Charter Next Generation, Inc - Bloomer
Charter Next Generation, Inc - Bloomer (126 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 90 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Charter Next Generation, Inc - Bloomer has more employees than the Film, plastics, packaging, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 1.2 3 0 0
2023 1.4 0.7 2 0 0
2022 2.3 0.8 3 0 0
2021 2.7 1.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326112 · WI · Bloomer

396 Film, plastics, packaging, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 23 employers in Bloomer, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bonset America Corporation 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR TriSeal 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR LaPorte Production Facility 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Zip-Pak 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Waunakee Remodeling 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE EDGERTON CONTRACTORS, INC 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ocean Spray Tomah Processing Plant 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dean WI - De Pere 126 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tractor Central LLC 256 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Health System-Chippewa Valley 214 FTE
CITY-NEAR Processed Metals Innovators, Inc. 165 FTE
CITY-NEAR GVS Filtration 129 FTE
NAT-TCR Johnson-Melloh Soluntions LLC 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Bloomingdale OH 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Insight Partners - Charlotte 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sno-Services LLC 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE General Metal Finishing 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2850-Sheraton Erie Bayfront 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amcor Rigid Packaging Orlando 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE SOEST 126 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.