Filters (e.g., air, engine oil, fuel) automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing · Wisconsin

GVS Filtration

Bloomer, WI · ~129 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

GVS Filtration runs at 31% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Filters (e.g., air, engine oil, fuel) automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

GVS Filtration: 1.7 TCR = 31% of Filters (e.g., air, engine oil, fuel) automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

GVS Filtration safety composite

GVS Filtration scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2024

GVS Filtration injury rate improved

GVS Filtration's TCR fell 1.2 from 1.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.2 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=2.0 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336390 · Bloomer, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.7 · 31% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/23
  • PHOTO Ricon
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~129 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ricon (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

GVS Filtration in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows GVS Filtration averages 1.7 TCR (31% of the Filters (e.g., air, engine oil, fuel) automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

GVS Filtration TCR series: 2016=1.2 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=2 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.4

Where GVS Filtration falls in its industry

772 Filters (e.g., air, engine oil establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 23 Filters (e.g., air, engine oil employers in Wisconsin.

GVS Filtration (129 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate GVS Filtration
GVS Filtration (129 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2

GVS Filtration has fewer employees than the Filters (e.g., air, engine oil, fuel) au median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.6 1.2 2 1 0
2022 3.9 3.9 6 0 0
2021 2.0 1.3 3 0 0
2020 2.7 2.7 3 1 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.2 1.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336390 · WI · Bloomer

772 Filters (e.g., air, engine oil, fuel) automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 23 employers in Bloomer, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ricon 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR ZF-Mesa 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Champion Laboratories - Michigan 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR XPER 912 Pittsburgh Road 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE MUZA Sheet Metal Company LLC 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cambria Mill 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schuman Cheese DBA Imperia Foods Inc. 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chippewa Falls Plant 129 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tractor Central LLC 256 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Health System-Chippewa Valley 214 FTE
CITY-NEAR Processed Metals Innovators, Inc. 165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Charter Next Generation, Inc - Bloomer 126 FTE
NAT-TCR Par Plumbing Co., Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Groton Public Library 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Oak Ridge Manor 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Hampton Inn Louisville Downtown 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Jeffrey Machine 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greeley County Health Services 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glencoe Park District 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Richfield 129 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.