Packaging film, plastics, single-web or multiweb, manufacturing · Wisconsin

Charter Next Generation - RP

Rhinelander, WI · ~82 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Charter Next Generation - RP runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Packaging film, plastics, single-web or multiweb, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Charter Next Generation - RP: 1.2 TCR = 38% of Packaging film, plastics, single-web or multiweb, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Charter Next Generation - RP safety composite

Charter Next Generation - RP scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2021→2023

Charter Next Generation - RP injury rate improved

Charter Next Generation - RP's TCR fell 1.7 from 2.7 in 2021 to 1.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.82× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=2.7 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326112 · Rhinelander, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 38% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #17/50
  • PHOTO TC Transcontinental …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~82 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TC Transcontinental Griffin (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Charter Next Generation - RP in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Charter Next Generation - RP averages 1.2 TCR (38% of the Packaging film, plastics, single-web or multiweb, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Charter Next Generation - RP TCR series: 2021=2.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=1 · BLS 3.3

Where Charter Next Generation - RP falls in its industry

396 Packaging film, plastics, sing establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 50 Packaging film, plastics, sing employers in Wisconsin.

Charter Next Generation - RP (82 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 90 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Charter Next Generation - RP
Charter Next Generation - RP (82 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 90 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Charter Next Generation - RP has fewer employees than the Packaging film, plastics, single-web or median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.7 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326112 · WI · Rhinelander

396 Packaging film, plastics, single-web or multiweb, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 52 employers in Rhinelander, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TC Transcontinental Griffin 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bemis Co. 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR BERRYPRY 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plitek LLC 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Van Der Geest Dairy Cattle, Inc. 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Pride Dairy LLC 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ebert Enterprises 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alma 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aspirus Rhinelander Hospital 583 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4538-9301 515 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rhinelander Mill 462 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-WIAPP006 448 FTE
NAT-TCR California Hydronics Corporation 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Joseph Plastics Main Office 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Heritage Cooperative: Canfield Grain, Energy, Office, & Store 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Quality Aircraft Accessories 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Builders Supply Co Inc. 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mi Cocina - 6740 Winning Drive Suite 1010 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Napco Pipe & Fittings Lodi 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cosmetic Specialties International 82 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.